|
This is the third in a planned series of editorials covering all aspects of good science writing. The term acronym is the name for a word made from the first letters of each word in a series of words. Some distinguish an acronym (such as NATO), which is pronounced as a word, from an initialism (such as FBI), which is pronounced by saying each letter separately. Most people, however, ignore such distinctions. The more general term abbreviation includes acronyms but also abbreviations that use letters other than the first letters of a word (such as nm for “nanometers” or Mr. for “mister”). Here, “acronym” will be used loosely to mean any abbreviation. Acronyms serve an important purpose in science writing: to speed up the reading and ease the understanding of the content of a paper. Thus, the goal of acronym use generally requires that the abbreviation be familiar, and that its use saves considerable space and/or prevents cumbersome repetition. We should use an acronym only when it will be referred to frequently throughout the text (say, five or more times) or because it is commonly known and understood. There is no requirement for authors to use acronyms—it is their choice if and when to use them. Additionally, authors should avoid uncommon abbreviations (if the reader is not familiar with the acronym, its use will likely detract from the readability of the paper). To be frank, acronyms are overused in JM3 (though it is certainly not a problem exclusive to our journal). It seems that authors love to use acronyms, especially if they are the ones inventing the acronym. The Chicago Manual of Style (which devotes a 35-page chapter to the subject of abbreviations) advises that “readers trying to keep track of a large number of abbreviations, especially unfamiliar ones, will lose their way.”1 This happens more frequently than authors (who are very familiar with their own acronyms) might think. To help guide authors in their use of acronyms, I’ve compiled some basic rules about when and how to use acronyms in a scientific publication.
Further, there are some rules about acronym use specific to JM3. In 2008, Burn Lin and the board of editors of JM3 developed a list of acronyms to help authors and improve consistency.2 This list has been recently updated ( http://spie.org/Documents/Publications/jmmacronym.pdf).
If the rules and guidelines above are followed, the use of an acronym will help rather than impede your reader’s understanding. This, of course, should always be the goal. ReferencesChicago Manual of Style, 558 15th ed.University of Chicago Press, Chicago
(2003). Google Scholar
B. J. Lin,
“Editorial: implementing JM3 acronyms,”
J. Micro/Nanolith. MEMS MOEMS, 7
(3), 030101
(2008). Google Scholar
|