Mr. Shumei Zhou Profile

Shumei Zhou

at Harbin Institute of Technology

SPIE Involvement:

Author

Publications (2)

This will count as one of your downloads.

You will have access to both the presentation and article (if available).

DOWNLOAD NOW

This content is available for download via your institution's subscription. To access this item, please sign in to your personal account.

Email or Username Forgot your username?

Password Forgot your password?

Show

Keep me signed in

No SPIE account? Create an account

Proceedings Article | 19 April 2013 Paper

Structural damage identification based on substructure sensitivity and l1 sparse regularization

Shumei Zhou, Yuequan Bao, Hui Li

Proceedings Volume 8692, 86923N (2013) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2009547

KEYWORDS: Sensors, Inverse problems, Structural health monitoring, Signal processing, Chemical elements, Damage detection, Compressed sensing, Neodymium, Applied mathematics, Structural dynamics

Read Abstract +

Sparsity constraints are now very popular to regularize inverse problems in the field of applied mathematics. Structural damage identification is a typical inverse problem of structural dynamics and Structural damage is a spatial sparse phenomenon, i.e., structural damage occurs, only part of elements or substructures are damaged. In this paper, a structural damage identification method based on the substructure-based sensitivity analysis and the sparse constraints regularization is proposed. Substructure sensitivity analysis, the establishment of structural damage stiffness parameter variation and change of modal parameters of linear equations between the measured degrees of freedom is limited, the equations for a morbid equation. The introduction of structural damage sparsity conditions, to minimize the l1 norm optimization solution. The numerical example of the 20 bay-truss structure with considering measurement noise, incomplete of measurements and multi-damage cases are carried out. The effects of number sensor and layout to the identification results are also investigated. The results indicated that the damage locations and extents can be effectively identified by the proposed method. Additionally, the sensor location can be random arrangement, which has great significance to the sensor placement of the actual structural health monitoring because robust structural damage identification also can be obtained even a few of sensor are failure.

Proceedings Article | 6 April 2012 Paper

Optimal sensor placement based on substructure sensitivity

Shumei Zhou, Yuequan Bao, Hui Li

Proceedings Volume 8345, 83453S (2012) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.915074

KEYWORDS: Sensors, Structural health monitoring, Diagnostics, Numerical simulations, Finite element methods, Shape analysis, Lithium, Data modeling, Structural dynamics, Genetic algorithms

Read Abstract +

Optimal sensor placement is key issues of structures health monitoring (SHM). In study of sensor placement, the main achievement focus on optimal criterions of sensor locations based on modal test, while optimal criterions of sensor locations based on damage identification, optimal method of sensor locations and optimal sensor number should be investigated further. In this study, a novel optimal sensor placement strategy based on sensitivity is proposed. Optimal sensor placement based on sensitivity analysis is an alternation method to consider damage identification. The basic idea of the proposed methodology is that influence range of different damage parameters is different. First, damage sensitivities in every element based on modal parameters are calculated. Then the elements that are sensitive to damage are selected. According to the detection of damage sensitivity in these elements, minimums number can be found by sensitivity. At last, the elements that are not selected are considered as not sensitive to modal parameters and would be placed the strain sensors. Numerical simulation of a three-dimensional truss structure is implemented to evaluate the minimum sensor number of different damage parameters according to the above methods. Moreover, damage location can be detected under singledamage situation and the element with most severe damage can be identified in multi-damage case using the proposed sensor placement.

My Library

You currently do not have any folders to save your paper to! Create a new folder below.

Folder Name

Folder Description

View contact details

UPDATE YOUR PROFILE

Is this your profile? Update it now.

Sign into your SPIE.org account

Don’t have a profile and want one?

Create an account on SPIE.org

Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks. You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*

*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please sign in to access your institution's subscriptions.

To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on SPIE.org.

ORGANIZATIONAL
Sign in with credentials provided by your organization.

Organizational Username

Organizational Password

Show/Hide Password

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available

Members:

Non-members: ADD TO CART

Keywords/Phrases

Search In:

Publication Years