Dr. Quirine M. Ketterings Profile

Dr. Quirine M. Ketterings

at Cornell College of Agriculture and Life Sciences

SPIE Involvement:

Author

Publications (1)

This will count as one of your downloads.

You will have access to both the presentation and article (if available).

DOWNLOAD NOW

This content is available for download via your institution's subscription. To access this item, please sign in to your personal account.

Email or Username Forgot your username?

Password Forgot your password?

Show

Keep me signed in

No SPIE account? Create an account

Proceedings Article | 13 June 2023 Presentation + Paper

A comparison of traditional and machine learning corn yield models using hyperspectral UAS and Landsat imagery

Nathan Burglewski, Quirine Ketterings, Sunoj Shajahan, Jan van Aardt

Proceedings Volume 12519, 125190B (2023) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2663715

KEYWORDS: Near infrared, Data modeling, Landsat, Machine learning, Vegetation, Reflectivity, Performance modeling, Imaging systems, Systems modeling

Read Abstract +

The operationalization of precision agriculture imaging-based systems, especially in staple crops like maize (Zea mays L.), requires a quantitative comparison of yield forecast approaches toward improved crop management. Here, we compare the implementation of linear and exponential based sileage yield models for maize to machinelearning (ML) based yield models utilizing spaceborne multispectral imagery (MSI) and unmanned aerial system (UAS) collected hyperspectral imagery (HSI), respectively. We collected UAS imagery in a maize field in upstate New York at the V10 growth stage using a Headwall Nano-Hyperspec 272-band visible and near-infrared imaging system to test the accuracy a feed forward neural network yield estimation regression model as well as a support vector regression (SVR). Landsat imagery of the same field was collected over ten separate instances throughout the season for use in linear and exponential regressions, while ground truth sileage yield data were provided by an on-board yield monitor during harvest. The neural network regression response induced between 4.6-13% mean absolute error (MAE), the linear and exponential regression yielded a best performance of 5.5%, while the SVR model ranged from 1.16-4.56% MAE. These results bode well for future implementation of such silage maize yield modeling approaches leveraging hyperspectral data that include the spectral red edge. However, we suggest that model efficacy should be evaluated for use in other regions.

My Library

You currently do not have any folders to save your paper to! Create a new folder below.

Folder Name

Folder Description

View contact details

UPDATE YOUR PROFILE

Is this your profile? Update it now.

Sign into your SPIE.org account

Don’t have a profile and want one?

Create an account on SPIE.org

Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks. You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*

*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please sign in to access your institution's subscriptions.

To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on SPIE.org.

ORGANIZATIONAL
Sign in with credentials provided by your organization.

Organizational Username

Organizational Password

Show/Hide Password

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available

Members:

Non-members: ADD TO CART

Keywords/Phrases

Search In:

Publication Years