Comparison of wavelet scalar quantization and JPEG for fingerprint image compression

Robert C. Kidd

doi:10.1117/12.195010

1 January 1995 Comparison of wavelet scalar quantization and JPEG for fingerprint image compression

Robert C. Kidd

Author Affiliations +

Journal of Electronic Imaging, Vol. 4, Issue 1, (January 1995). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.195010

Abstract

An overview of the wavelet scalar quantization (WSQ) and Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) image compression algorithms is given. Results of application of both algorithms to a database of 60 fingerprint images are then discussed. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) results for WSQ, JPEG with quantization matrix (QM) optimization, and JPEG with standard QM scaling are given at several average bit rates. In all cases, optimized-QM JPEG is equal or superior to WSQ in SNR performance. At 0.48 bit/pixel, which is in the operating range proposed by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), WSQ and QM-optimized JPEG exhibit nearly identical SNR performance. In addition, neither was subjectively preferred on average by human viewers in a forced-choice image-quality experiment. Although WSQ was chosen by the FBI as the national standard for compression of digital fingerprint images on the basis of image quallty that was ostensibly superior to that of existing internationalstandard JPEG, it appears possible that this superiority was due more to lack of optimization of JPEG parameters than to inherent superiority of the WSQ algorithm. Furthermore, substantial worldwide support for JPEG has developed due to its status as an international standard, and WSQ is significantly slower than JPEG in software implementation. Still, it is possible that WSQ enhanced with an optimal quantizer-design algorithm could outperform JPEG. This is a topic for future research.

Citation Download Citation

Robert C. Kidd "Comparison of wavelet scalar quantization and JPEG for fingerprint image compression," Journal of Electronic Imaging 4(1), (1 January 1995). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.195010

Published: 1 January 1995

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available