18 February 2016 Accuracy assessment of LiDAR-derived digital elevation models in a rural landscape with complex terrain
Laura Barreiro-Fernández, Sandra Buján, David Miranda, Ulises Diéguez-Aranda, Eduardo González-Ferreiro
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
Digital elevation models (DEMs) are essential in many professional areas as they produce georeferenced elevation data that are critical for a wide range of studies, computations, decision-making processes, and derived products. Quality control thus becomes necessary to quantify the accuracy of the information provided. We assessed the accuracy of elevation data estimated by DEMs derived from LiDAR data representing diverse land cover types. For this purpose, we used the FUSION software and explored variations in accuracy in relation to the following factors: input data, interpolation methods, terrain slope, heterogeneity of land cover, and LiDAR point density. We selected and measured 1157 checkpoints by using total station and GPS techniques and following a stratified random design in order to validate the LiDAR-derived DEMs. We used robust estimators, nonparametric tests, and analysis of variance to examine the elevation errors. The study findings showed the following: (1) using the full set of LiDAR returns did not improve elevation accuracy relative to using the last-return data set; (2) using the minimum switch for interpolation did not improve accuracy compared to the default behavior of the interpolator; (3) land cover and slope significantly affected accuracy; (4) DEMs tended to underestimate elevation; and (5) the mean density of the returns classified as ground was significantly affected by land cover and slope factors.
© 2016 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) 1931-3195/2016/$25.00 © 2016 SPIE
Laura Barreiro-Fernández, Sandra Buján, David Miranda, Ulises Diéguez-Aranda, and Eduardo González-Ferreiro "Accuracy assessment of LiDAR-derived digital elevation models in a rural landscape with complex terrain," Journal of Applied Remote Sensing 10(1), 016014 (18 February 2016). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JRS.10.016014
Published: 18 February 2016
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 11 scholarly publications.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
LIDAR

Error analysis

Data modeling

Vegetation

Accuracy assessment

Statistical analysis

Switches

Back to Top