Open Access
6 January 2022 Label-free fiber nanograting sensor for real-time in situ early monitoring of cellular apoptosis
Danran Li, Nina Wang, Tianyang Zhang, Guangxing Wu, Yifeng Xiong, Qianqian Du, Yunfei Tian, Weiwei Zhao, Jiandong Ye, Shulin Gu, Yanqing Lu, Dechen Jiang, Fei Xu
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The achievement of functional nanomodules for subcellular label-free measurement has long been pursued in order to fully understand cellular functions. Here, a compact label-free nanosensor based on a fiber taper and zinc oxide nanogratings is designed and applied for the early monitoring of apoptosis in individual living cells. Because of its nanoscale dimensions, mechanical flexibility, and minimal cytotoxicity to cells, the sensing module can be loaded in cells for long term in situ tracking with high sensitivity. A gradual increase in the nuclear refractive index during the apoptosis process is observed, revealing the increase in molecular density and the decrease in cell volume. The strategy used in our study not only contributes to the understanding of internal environmental variations during cellular apoptosis but also provides a new platform for nonfluorescent fiber devices for investigation of cellular events and understanding fundamental cell biochemical engineering.

1.

Introduction

The intracellular microenvironment involves vital physiological characteristics of various cellular compartments. The fabrication of nanoprobes for subcellular measurement is important to fully characterize cellular function. Single-cell interrogation at the nanoscale is carried out mainly via optical approaches, such as the use of fluorescent dyes,13 quantum dots or nanoparticles,411 nanofiber probes,12,13 single nanowire probes,1419 and planar photonic crystal nanowaveguides;20 mechanical approaches, such as the use of atomic force microscopy probes2123 and nanobeam arrays;24 and electrochemical approaches, such as the utilization of single metal nanowires,25,26 pillars, or tube electrodes.2731 Dyes and quantum-dot-based probes have attracted much attention in biology, attributable to their photoluminescence (PL), and achieved great success in measuring the temperature of cells and their organelles,32,33 as they can be easily phagocytosed by cells due to their ultrasmall dimensions and are quite robust against external disturbances. However, these techniques suffer from some limitations, such as fluorescence bleaching and background fluorescence interruption. Optical nanofibers have become increasingly popular owing to their excellent optical waveguiding property, high flexibility, and ease of integration34 and thus have been applied for the detection of intracellular pH14 and ionic concentrations.15 Notably, the existing fiber probes are passive in nature and serve only as conduits to guide light signals into/from a cell but not as a complete optical functional module for physical or chemical label-free sensing. Accordingly, most nanoprobe techniques still have to modify other nanoparticles, resulting in the low functional integration of structures.

The miniaturization of optical modules based on fibers is continuously pursued by researchers. Limited by manufacturing techniques, the scale of all-fiber functional modules is on the order of tens or hundreds of micrometers,35,36 which is not applicable compared to the sizes of most common biological cells. Fortunately, one-dimensional nanowires compensate for this deficiency. Their smaller dimensions and high robustness make them suitable for optical resonators,37 couplers,38 gratings,39 and lasers.40,41 However, most of the current optical nanodevices are fixed on substrates, lacking portability and the plug-and-play feature. Moreover, local far-field incident light also implies low-energy efficiency. For an indeed label-free device, the excitation, transmission, detection, and collection of light signals should be integrated in the same device without any chemical modification. Only in this way can the integration of the device, the convenience of manipulation, and the efficiency of sensing be greatly improved. Under these circumstances, the combination of nanowire optical devices and fiber probes provides a novel configuration. Adhered to the tip of a tapered fiber, the nanodevice can be freely moved, can be flexibly directed to anywhere, and can safely penetrate the plasma membrane and enter biological cells, which is potentially useful in single-cell interrogation with high resolution and efficiency.

In this paper, we develop a compact label-free nanosensor based on a complete functional module composed of a fiber taper integrated with zinc oxide (ZnO) nanogratings for the early monitoring of apoptosis in living cells, as illustrated in Fig. 1(a). Cellular apoptosis, which is involved in cell turnover in many healthy adult tissues, is responsible for the focal elimination of cells during normal embryonic development. The visualization and monitoring of early apoptosis and the real-time tracking of cell status with high sensitivity in living cells are highly desired. We choose a single ZnO nanowire not only because of its low toxicity and high biological compatibility, but also because it can serve as a waveguiding matrix and has low transmission loss and a relatively high refractive index (RI, n=1.9831 at 655 nm), which are required for strong light confinement in the nanowire, especially in aqueous environments (n=1.3310 at 655 nm). Moreover, the uniform diameter of the nanowire results in less physical damage to cellular structures and functions than caused by a conical optical fiber probe when penetrating a cell. With optical nanogratings etched on the ZnO nanowire, the integrated fiber sensor is functionalized with the capability of simultaneously sending and receiving optical signals, being sensitive to changes in the surrounding environment, and can realize rapid, accurate, and real-time sensing by being physically located in a single living cell. In our study, we find that the RI of the nucleus is higher than that of the cytoplasm in HeLa cells. More importantly, a gradual increase in nuclear RI during the apoptosis process after the invasion of hydrogen peroxide is observed, which illustrates an increase in molecular density and a decrease in cell volume.42 Overall, the quantitative probing and analysis of the RI naturally present in single living cells during apoptosis may offer insight into the life activities within cells. Additionally, our strategy creates a precedent that allows a passive fiber nanodevice for in situ, dynamic intracellular monitoring and may provide new ideas for a number of novel studies combining photonics with biochemistry.

Fig. 1

Schematic illustration and design of the fiber nanogratings sensor. (a) Schematic diagram of the ZnO nanogratings integrated on a fiber bioprobe. (b) SEM image of the fiber sensor, with a nanowire diameter of 800 nm. Scale bar, 1  μm. Inset, details of the nanogratings in the yellow dashed rectangle. (c) Microscope image of the fiber sensor with the nanogratings against a bright field. Scale bar, 10  μm. Inset, microscope image of the nanowire against a dark field, with incident light of 633 nm. Scale bar, 5  μm.

AP_4_1_016001_f001.png

2.

Results and Discussion

2.1.

Architectures of the Fiber Nanogratings Sensor

The nanosensor was fabricated by bonding ZnO nanogratings on the tip of an optical fiber taper (see Sec. S1 in the Supplementary Material). The manufactured fiber taper had a conical transition region generally several millimeters in length and a long pigtail to allow prompt linking to other optical fiber components. Light traveling along the fiber can be effectively coupled into the nanogratings, where part of the light is reflected back. Predictably, thinner nanowires cause fewer injuries to cell membranes during the puncture process; however, a larger diameter is more desirable in terms of light confinement and mechanical robustness. Therefore, we prioritized nanowires with diameters of 500 to 800 nm. The microscope image [see Fig. 1(c)] of a typical probe shows that a single ZnO nanowire with gratings in the visible band (660  nm) etched on the front end was successfully attached onto the tip of the fiber taper. The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) micrograph of the nanostructured probe [see Fig. 1(b)] shows that the gratings on the ZnO nanowire included 40 shallow grooves with a period Λ=169  nm, resulting in a total length <7  μm, which is two orders of magnitude shorter than gratings fabricated in conventional optical fibers. Each groove was 100  nm deep and 80  nm wide and located at a position with a local radius of 400  nm. The configuration has good manufacturing reproducibility and stability.

For a highly efficient nanowire probe, the optical output is closely confined to the ZnO nanowire, offering highly localized illumination. Owing to the excellent waveguiding properties of both the optical fiber and ZnO nanowire, the optical transmission loss is generally concentrated in the coupling region between them. As illustrated in our previous research,43 the normalized optical power flow coupled into the nanowire depends on the propagating constants of the two waveguides, which are related to the diameters of the two waveguides in the coupling region. To improve the coupling efficiency, we designed and fabricated probes with appropriate sizes. Figure 1(b) clearly shows that most light transmitted in the fiber probe is coupled into the nanowire. Benefitting from the high RI of ZnO, the external environmental RI hardly affects the optical coupling and light propagation.

2.2.

Optical Characteristics and Calibration in vitro

The setup used to test the nanogratings sensor is illustrated in Sec. S3 in the Supplementary Material. Figure 2(a) shows the typical reflectance spectrum of the fiber probe immersed in deionized water (see Sec. S3 in the Supplementary Material). To investigate the function of the ZnO nanogratings, we measured the reflectance spectra of the fiber taper without (black curve) and with (blue curve) the ZnO nanogratings. It is evident that the sole fiber taper reflects little light, while by contrast, the ZnO nanogratings have a characteristic reflection wavelength at 658  nm. The ratio of reflectance is 30% compared to the end face of a sliced fiber. The extinction ratio, which indicates the ratio of the maximum to minimum reflection intensities, is 11  dB, and the full-width at half-maximum is 8  nm.

Fig. 2

Optical characteristics and RI sensitivity of the nanosensor. (a) Reflectance spectra of the fiber probe with (blue line) and without (black line) ZnO nanogratings. The peak wavelength is 658 nm. (b) Color map of spectra with different external RIs. (c) Shift in the peak reflection wavelength (black line) and the change in power at 655 nm (red line) as a function of the external RI. The red line is derived from the values in (b). (d) Dynamic response of the reflection power at 655 nm with the addition of ethanol (black line) and the power at 655 nm as a function of the external RI (red line). The figure closely coincides with the red line in (c).

AP_4_1_016001_f002.png

A distinctive feature of optical gratings is that they are very sensitive to the RI of the external environment.44 With the change in RI, we discovered an apparent redshift in the peak reflection wavelength [see Fig. 2(b) and Sec. S5 in the Supplementary Material]. Figure 2(c) (black line) demonstrates the linear relationship between the peak reflection wavelength of the nanosensor and the surrounding RI, with a sensitivity of 83  nm/RIU. The experimental result is in good agreement with the theoretical simulation (see Sec. S2 in the Supplementary Material). After calibration, the RI of pure phosphate buffered saline (PBS, HyClone) was measured to be 1.3345, again similar to previously reported data.45

Using the shift in the spectrum is a common method in optical sensing,46 whereas the increase in temperature resulting from the high light power cannot be neglected, as it may cause predictable thermal damage to the cells. To make the experimental conditions more rigorous, a low-power laser at 655 nm was used as the light source to conduct single-cell sensing. Figure 2(c) (red line) shows the reflection power of 655 nm derived from Fig. 2(b) (red dashed line) with increasing RI. The power sensitivity is 1260%/RIU. The linear relationship indicates that measuring the power change of a single wavelength is another feasible optical sensing approach. As illustrated in Fig. 3(a), the laser (800  nW) was injected into the fiber nanosensor and the reflected signal was collected with a power meter (see Sec. S4 in the Supplementary Material). The optical power passing through the fiber taper was hundreds of nanowatts, but the light was not completely incident into the cell because nearly half the light was lost in the coupling region between the fiber taper and the nanowire. The power threshold before cell damaging and death involves the exposure time, the size of the cell, and the volume of the solution,47 but the power we used is far lower than the threshold. Such low optical power can have little impact on cell activities, as heat dissipates quickly in PBS solution. The calibration indicates that with increasing RI, the reflection power at 655 nm will gradually decrease within a certain range [see Fig. 2(d), black line]. Therefore, the RI information can also be obtained by measuring the light power at a single wavelength, with the experimental sensitivity of the nanosensor being 1280%/RIU for an RI ranging from 1.330 to 1.350 (red line). This result is generally consistent with the experimental results presented in Fig. 2(c) (red line).

Fig. 3

Intracellular calibration and measurements of the nanosensor. (a) Schematic diagram of the experimental setup used to calibrate the RI sensitivity of the probe and measure the intracellular RI of HeLa cells. A low-power laser at 655 nm (800  nW) was injected into the pigtail of the fiber probe through port 2 of a visible circulator. The output light reflected at the nanogratings was transmitted through port 3 of the circulator, which was connected to an optical power meter to record the reflection power. Microscope and PL images of the tested cell (in red circle) and other reference cells. The tested cell was penetrated by a fiber probe with an 500  nm conical tip (b) and a ZnO nanograting-integrated fiber probe with an 800  nm tip (c). Scale bar, 40  μm. Microscope images of the ZnO nanowire-integrated fiber probe inserted into the (d) nucleus and (e) cytoplasm of single HeLa cells. Scale bar, 10  μm. (f) Normalized reflection power in the cytoplasm and nucleus of a single HeLa cell, indicating the difference in RI.

AP_4_1_016001_f003.png

2.3.

Safe Penetration Tests

To demonstrate that the nanowire probes incurred negligible cell membrane damage during insertion and extraction, fluorescent dyes were used to verify whether the cell membranes were ruptured (see Sec. S8 in the Supplementary Material). Optical fiber probes with and without a ZnO nanowire were manipulated to penetrate HeLa cells. HeLa was the first human cell line established in culture and has since become the most widely used human cell line in biological research.48 Figure 3(b) shows the tested cell (red circle) after insertion of a fiber probe with an 500  nm tip. But for the conical structure, the actual damaged area of the membrane was larger than the tip diameter. The PL intensity decreased significantly compared with that of other cells 3 min after puncture, which indicated that the cell membrane was likely to be damaged, resulting in the outflow of dyes. Figure 3(c) shows the tested cell (red circle) after insertion of the ZnO nanowire-integrated fiber probe with an 800  nm tip. Owing to the uniform diameter of the nanowire, the PL intensity of the tested cell showed no apparent differences compared with the surrounding cells within 3 min after puncture, indicating that the cell membrane was still relatively intact. The observation of fluorescence from the cells shows that the cells continued to hydrolyse fluorescein diacetate to generate fluorescein inside the cells. Therefore, it is feasible to use the ZnO nanowire-integrated fiber sensor to implement intracellular measurements.

2.4.

Intracellular Experiments on RI Sensing

Figures 3(d) and 3(e) show that the nucleus and cytoplasm regions of single HeLa cells are clearly visible in the microscope images even after insertion of the ZnO nanograting-integrated fiber sensor (see Sec. S7 in the Supplementary Material). The nanowire is robust against cell penetration, with no obvious mechanical deformation. As illustrated in Fig. 3(f), the normalized reflection power declined by 0.5% when the probe was transferred from PBS into the cytoplasm and decreased by 7% when the probe entered the nucleus. The tiny fluctuations (0.08%) of real-time power stemmed from the variations of the light source power and the unevenness of intracellular microenvironments. Notably, the experiment was carried out in a constant temperature environment to eliminate the influence of temperature fluctuations. The probe did not stay in the cytoplasm after measuring the RI of the nucleus, so the information from nucleus-cytoplasm-PBS was not apparent. If we extract the probe out of the cell slower, the information will be basically similar to the former. We tested four single HeLa cells, and the probe was cleaned with PBS solution before and after each test to avoid contamination. The experimental results in Table 1 and Sec. S9 in the Supplementary Material indicate that the mean RI of the cytoplasm and the nucleus in the HeLa cells was 1.3348 and 1.3402, respectively. The distribution of substances in the cells is possibly nonuniform, and it can be inferred that the RI results of the single HeLa cells relate to the position of the probe. Since the RI is generally proportional to the molecular concentration, which is related to the viscosity of solutions, the molecular density of the cytoplasm is deduced to be slightly higher than that of PBS and the molecular density of the nucleus is much higher than that of the cytoplasm. The relatively stable fluctuation of the reflection power also indicated that the signal light had little thermal effect on the cells. Previous studies using optical diffraction tomography also drew similar conclusions.42 Compared with traditional far-field detection techniques, our method is more energy efficient, as only very low-power probe light is required.

Table 1

RI measured in the cytoplasm and nucleus of four HeLa cells.

Cell No.Decrease in power (ΔP1) in cytoplasm (%)RI in cytoplasmDecrease in power (ΔP2) in nucleus (%)RI in nucleus
10.341.33487.411.3403
20.691.33509.591.3420
30.131.33465.621.3389
40.251.33476.391.3395

2.5.

Intracellular Dynamic Monitoring of Cellular Apoptosis

Cell apoptosis is an integral part of normal development and the maturation cycle. Despite the importance of this process, the mechanisms underlying cell death are still poorly understood. Previous work has shown the RI changes of cells can indirectly reflect different intracellular behaviors.42 Therefore, we hope to discover the connection between nuclear RI and cell apoptosis under external stimuli, which is helpful for further understanding of cell life events and development of diseases. The advantage of using nanogratings instead of fluorescence for single-cell detection is that the nanoconfiguration is more stable and reliable for long-term monitoring because fluorescence suffers from quenching and bleaching. After the probe punctured the nucleus of a HeLa cell, 10  μL of 20 mmol/L H2O2 PBS solution was injected into the medium. Hydrogen peroxide (n=1.3350 at 655 nm) is a strong oxidant that breaks down cell membranes and is thus fatal to cells. The microscope images of the detected HeLa cells [see Fig. 4(a)4(d)] show the variation in cell appearance. Simultaneously, a reduction in the reflection intensities was observed in the nucleus, indicating a continuous increase in RI with time [see Fig. 4(e)]. The gradual increase in nuclear RI went through three periods. During the first period, which lasted 20  min, the process of apoptosis was slow. The cytoplasm was gradually dissolved under the corrosion of hydrogen peroxide, but the morphology of the nucleus did not have a notable impact [see Fig. 4(b)], and the RI of the nucleus increased slowly. During the second period, which lasted 10min, large areas of the cytoplasm dissolved, and the nucleus began to shrink [see Fig. 4(c)]. The nuclear RI rapidly increased by 0.0040 with decreasing nuclear volume. During the last period, the cells had little vitality, and the nuclear RI tended to become stable. We tested three single HeLa cells, and the mean nuclear RI after cell apoptosis was 1.3442, as indicated in Table 2 and Sec. S12 in the Supplementary Material. Although the exact reasons for the changes in the RI of the nucleus are still unknown, our results imply that the shape and volume of the cell are at least partly responsible. The numbers of pixels that the cell nucleus occupied in the microscope images [see Figs. 4(a)4(d)] during the process of cell apoptosis were counted, which could roughly reflect the volume of the cell nucleus [see Fig. 4(e), blue circles]. The volume of the cell nucleus gradually contracted, leading to an increase in molecular density, which is one of the possible reasons for the increase in the nuclear RI.

Fig. 4

Real-time long-term early monitoring of HeLa cell apoptosis. Microscope images of single tested HeLa cells (yellow dashed circle) and other reference cells during the apoptosis process. (a) Immediately after the addition of H2O2, (b) 10 min after the addition of H2O2, (c) 30 min after the addition of H2O2, and (d) apoptotic cells 40 min after the addition of H2O2, scale bar, 20  μm. (e) Normalized reflection power in the nucleus of a single tested HeLa cell during apoptosis under the stimulation of H2O2 (black line), indicating a continuous increase in the nuclear RI. The numbers of pixels that the cell nucleus occupies in the microscope images (blue circle) roughly indicate the volume of the nucleus. Inset, PL images of living and apoptotic HeLa cells. Scale bar, 20  μm.

AP_4_1_016001_f004.png

Table 2

Measured RI of the nucleus in three apoptotic HeLa cells.

Cell No.Decrease in power (ΔP2) in nucleus before apoptosis (%)Nuclear RI before apoptosisDecrease in power (ΔP3) in nucleus after apoptosis (%)Nuclear RI after apoptosis
58.161.340813.891.3453
66.921.339911.531.3435
77.591.340511.921.3438

A mature fluorescence technique was used to examine the cell viability of the tested cells and other normal cells during the process of apoptosis (see Secs. S10 and S11 in the Supplementary Material). The fluorescent dye we chose presents little toxicity to cells, can infiltrate through cell membranes, and is often used for nuclear staining and cell apoptosis tests (see Sec. S10 in the Supplementary Material).49 As shown in Fig. 4(e), the intensity of the PL signal underwent an apparent increase 40 min after H2O2 was injected, confirming that the cells had indeed been apoptotic. Moreover, the PL intensity of the tested cell (yellow dashed circle) had no obvious difference from that of other surrounding cells, which again indicated that the ZnO nanogratings had little influence on the cell life states.

3.

Conclusion

We developed a versatile, biocompatible, portable, and reusable ZnO nanograting-integrated label-free nanosensor that enables in situ early monitoring of cellular apoptosis. The nanodevice integrates signal transmission, sensing, and collection, with high integration, operability, and sensitivity. By inserting the nanoscale functional optical module into single living HeLa cells, we can detect different features between the nucleus and cytoplasm. The highly flexible and robust nanosensor allowed us to reveal that the mean RI of the nucleus is 0.0054 higher than that of the cytoplasm in single HeLa cells, which to some extent verifies the higher molecular density of the nucleus than that of cytoplasm. Moreover, the stable and nondegradable configuration is promising for the long-term monitoring of cellular environmental variations, which are universally present in all cell life activities. We observed a decrease in the nuclear volume and detected the nuclear RI during cell apoptosis. The results show that the final mean RI is 0.0040 higher than that of normal living cells, linking the RI and the volume of the nucleus to the state of living cells. We consider that it is feasible to detect and compare the differences between normal living cells and cancer cells using the same sensing device. The application of the nanoprobe is only limited by the size of the cell and has no requirement for the type of cells. This study is the first to realize apoptosis sensing and tracking with nanogratings in living cells. Real-time probing of cellular apoptosis will not only attract more attention to cell life events but also broaden the application scope of fiber nanosensors.

Acknowledgments

This research was sponsored by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 61925502 and 62135007). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

1. 

A. Colom et al., “A fluorescent membrane tension probe,” Nat. Chem., 10 (11), 1118 –1125 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-018-0127-3 NCAHBB 1755-4330 Google Scholar

2. 

J. S. Donner et al., “Mapping intracellular temperature using green fluorescent protein,” Nano Lett., 12 (4), 2107 –2111 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl300389y NALEFD 1530-6984 Google Scholar

3. 

K. Okabe et al., “Intracellular temperature mapping with a fluorescent polymeric thermometer and fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy,” Nat. Commun., 3 (1), 705 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1714 NCAOBW 2041-1723 Google Scholar

4. 

J. M. Yang, H. Yang and L. Lin, “Quantum dot nanothermometers reveal heterogeneous local thermogenesis in living cells,” ACS Nano, 5 (6), 5067 –5071 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1021/nn201142f ANCAC3 1936-0851 Google Scholar

5. 

X. Chen et al., “Imaging the transient heat generation of individual nanostructures with a mechanoresponsive polymer,” Nat. Commun., 8 (1), 1498 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01614-0 NCAOBW 2041-1723 Google Scholar

6. 

G. Kucsko et al., “Nanometre-scale thermometry in a living cell,” Nature, 500 (7460), 54 –58 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12373 Google Scholar

7. 

Z. Chen et al., “Single gold@silver nanoprobes for real-time tracing the entire autophagy process at single-cell level,” J. Am. Chem. Soc., 137 (5), 1903 –1908 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja5112628 JACSAT 0002-7863 Google Scholar

8. 

O. A. Savchuk et al., “Thermochromic upconversion nanoparticles for visual temperature sensors with high thermal, spatial and temporal resolution,” J. Mater. Chem. C, 4 (27), 6602 –6613 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1039/C6TC01841F Google Scholar

9. 

X. Zhu et al., “Temperature-feedback upconversion nanocomposite for accurate photothermal therapy at facile temperature,” Nat. Commun., 7 (1), 10437 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10437 NCAOBW 2041-1723 Google Scholar

10. 

P. C. Wuytens et al., “Gold nanodome-patterned microchips for intracellular surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy,” Analyst, 140 (24), 8080 –8087 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/C5AN01782C ANLYAG 0365-4885 Google Scholar

11. 

K. Yum et al., “Mechanochemical delivery and dynamic tracking of fluorescent quantum dots in the cytoplasm and nucleus of living cells,” Nano Lett., 9 (5), 2193 –2198 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl901047u NALEFD 1530-6984 Google Scholar

12. 

T. Vo-Dinh et al., “Antibody-based nanoprobe for measurement of a fluorescent analyte in a single cell,” Nat. Biotechnol., 18 (7), 764 –767 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/77337 NABIF9 1087-0156 Google Scholar

13. 

Q. Yang et al., “Fiber-optic-based micro-probe using hexagonal 1-in-6 fiber configuration for intracellular single-cell pH measurement,” Anal. Chem., 87 (14), 7171 –7179 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.5b01040 ANCHAM 0003-2700 Google Scholar

14. 

R. Yan et al., “Nanowire-based single-cell endoscopy,” Nat. Nanotechnol., 7 (3), 191 –196 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2011.226 NNAABX 1748-3387 Google Scholar

15. 

J. Lee et al., “Quantitative probing of Cu2+ ions naturally present in single living cells,” Adv. Mater., 28 (21), 4071 –4076 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201600161 ADVMEW 0935-9648 Google Scholar

16. 

J. H. Lee et al., “Spontaneous internalization of cell penetrating peptide-modified nanowires into primary neurons,” Nano Lett., 16 (2), 1509 –1513 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b00020 NALEFD 1530-6984 Google Scholar

17. 

X. Cao et al., “Single silicon nanowire-based fluorescent sensor for endogenous hypochlorite in an individual cell,” Adv. Biosyst., 2 (12), 1800213 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/adbi.201800213 Google Scholar

18. 

C. Chiappini et al., “Biodegradable silicon nanoneedles delivering nucleic acids intracellularly induce localized in vivo neovascularization,” Nat. Mater., 14 (5), 532 –539 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4249 NMAACR 1476-1122 Google Scholar

19. 

W. Hong et al., “Nanoscale label-free bioprobes to detect intracellular proteins in single living cells,” Sci. Rep., 4 (1), 6179 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep06179 SRCEC3 2045-2322 Google Scholar

20. 

G. Shambat et al., “Single-cell photonic nanocavity probes,” Nano Lett., 13 (11), 4999 –5005 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl304602d NALEFD 1530-6984 Google Scholar

21. 

A. Meister et al., “FluidFM: combining atomic force microscopy and nanofluidics in a universal liquid delivery system for single cell applications and beyond,” Nano Lett., 9 (6), 2501 –2507 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl901384x NALEFD 1530-6984 Google Scholar

22. 

P. Knittel et al., “Focused ion beam-assisted fabrication of soft high-aspect ratio silicon nanowire atomic force microscopy probes,” Ultramicroscopy, 179 24 –32 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2017.03.031 ULTRD6 0304-3991 Google Scholar

23. 

O. Guillaume-Gentil et al., “Tunable single-cell extraction for molecular analyses,” Cell, 166 (2), 506 –516 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.06.025 CELLB5 0092-8674 Google Scholar

24. 

F. Santoro et al., “Revealing the cell-material interface with nanometer resolution by focused ion beam/scanning electron microscopy,” ACS Nano, 11 (8), 8320 –8328 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.7b03494 ANCAC3 1936-0851 Google Scholar

25. 

S. M. Yoo et al., “Electrotriggered, spatioselective, quantitative gene delivery into a single cell nucleus by Au nanowire nanoinjector,” Nano Lett., 13 (6), 2431 –2435 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl4003393 NALEFD 1530-6984 Google Scholar

26. 

G. Lu et al., “Live-cell SERS endoscopy using plasmonic nanowire waveguides,” Adv. Mater., 26 (30), 5124 –5128 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201401237 ADVMEW 0935-9648 Google Scholar

27. 

P. D. Tovee et al., “Nanoscale resolution scanning thermal microscopy using carbon nanotube tipped thermal probes,” Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 16 (3), 1174 –1181 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/C3CP53047G PPCPFQ 1463-9076 Google Scholar

28. 

R. Pan et al., “Resistive-pulse sensing inside single living cells,” J. Am. Chem. Soc., 142 (12), 5778 –5784 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b13796 JACSAT 0002-7863 Google Scholar

29. 

H. Liu et al., “A multiparameter pH-sensitive nanodevice based on plasmonic nanopores,” Adv. Funct. Mater., 28 (1), 1703847 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201703847 AFMDC6 1616-301X Google Scholar

30. 

Y. Zhang et al., “Spearhead nanometric field-effect transistor sensors for single-cell analysis,” ACS Nano, 10 (3), 3214 –3221 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.5b05211 ANCAC3 1936-0851 Google Scholar

31. 

R. Singhal et al., “Multifunctional carbon-nanotube cellular endoscopes,” Nat. Nanotechnol., 6 (1), 57 –64 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2010.241 NNAABX 1748-3387 Google Scholar

32. 

D. Chrétien et al., “Mitochondria are physiologically maintained at close to 50°C,” PLoS Biol., 16 (1), e2003992 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2003992 Google Scholar

33. 

S. Arai et al., “Mitochondria-targeted fluorescent thermometer monitors intracellular temperature gradient,” Chem. Commun., 51 (38), 8044 –8047 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CC01088H CHCOFS 1359-7345 Google Scholar

34. 

X. Fan et al., “Sensitive optical biosensors for unlabeled targets: a review,” Anal. Chim. Acta, 620 (1–2), 8 –26 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2008.05.022 ACACAM 0003-2670 Google Scholar

35. 

J. L. Kou et al., “Demonstration of a compact temperature sensor based on first-order Bragg grating in a tapered fiber probe,” Opt. Express, 19 (19), 18452 –18457 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.19.018452 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

36. 

J. L. Kou et al., “Miniaturized fiber taper reflective interferometer for high temperature measurement,” Opt. Express, 18 (13), 14245 –14250 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.18.014245 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar

37. 

Z. Hu, X. Guo and L. Tong, “Freestanding nanowire ring laser,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 103 (18), 183104 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4827251 APPLAB 0003-6951 Google Scholar

38. 

X. Xing et al., “Ultracompact photonic coupling splitters twisted by PTT nanowires,” Nano Lett., 8 (9), 2839 –2843 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl8014507 NALEFD 1530-6984 Google Scholar

39. 

A. Fu et al., “Widely tunable distributed Bragg reflectors integrated into nanowire waveguides,” Nano Lett., 15 (10), 6909 –6913 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02839 NALEFD 1530-6984 Google Scholar

40. 

R. Röder et al., “Ultrafast dynamics of lasing semiconductor nanowires,” Nano Lett., 15 (7), 4637 –4643 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b01271 NALEFD 1530-6984 Google Scholar

41. 

J. Tatebayashi et al., “Room-temperature lasing in a single nanowire with quantum dots,” Nat. Photonics, 9 (8), 501 –505 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2015.111 NPAHBY 1749-4885 Google Scholar

42. 

T. K. Kim et al., “Physicochemical properties of nucleoli in live cells analyzed by label-free optical diffraction tomography,” Cells, 8 (7), 699 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8070699 Google Scholar

43. 

D. R. Li et al., “Ethanol gas sensor based on a hybrid polymethyl methacrylate–silica microfiber coupler,” J. Lightwave Technol., 36 (10), 2031 –2036 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2018.2802917 JLTEDG 0733-8724 Google Scholar

44. 

F. Chiavaioli et al., “Biosensing with optical fiber gratings,” Nanophotonics, 6 (4), 663 –679 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2016-0178 Google Scholar

45. 

S. Cohen-Maslaton et al., “Cell and nucleus refractive-index mapping by interferometric phase microscopy and rapid confocal fluorescence microscopy,” J. Biophotonics, 13 (9), e202000117 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/jbio.202000117 Google Scholar

46. 

F. Chiavaioli, “Recent development of resonance-based optical sensors and biosensors,” Optics, 1 (3), 255 –258 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/opt1030019 Google Scholar

47. 

A. Calabuig et al., “Investigating fibroblast cells under ‘safe’ and ‘injurious’ blue-light exposure by holographic microscopy,” J. Biophotonics, 10 (6–7), 919 –927 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/jbio.201500340. Google Scholar

48. 

J. J. M. Landry et al., “The genomic and transcriptomic landscape of a HeLa cell line,” G3-Genes Genom. Genet., 3 (8), 1213 –1224 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.113.005777 Google Scholar

49. 

C. Huang et al., “Long-term blue light exposure induces RGC-5 cell death in vitro: involvement of mitochondria-dependent apoptosis, oxidative stress, and MAPK signaling pathways,” Apoptosis, 19 (6), 922 –932 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10495-014-0983-2 Google Scholar

50. 

T. Erdogan, “Fiber grating spectra,” J. Lightwave Technol., 15 (8), 1277 –1294 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1109/50.618322 JLTEDG 0733-8724 Google Scholar

Biographies of the authors are not available.

CC BY: © The Authors. Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI.
Danran Li, Nina Wang, Tianyang Zhang, Guangxing Wu, Yifeng Xiong, Qianqian Du, Yunfei Tian, Weiwei Zhao, Jiandong Ye, Shulin Gu, Yanqing Lu, Dechen Jiang, and Fei Xu "Label-free fiber nanograting sensor for real-time in situ early monitoring of cellular apoptosis," Advanced Photonics 4(1), 016001 (6 January 2022). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.AP.4.1.016001
Received: 26 October 2021; Accepted: 14 December 2021; Published: 6 January 2022
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 14 scholarly publications.
Advertisement
Advertisement
KEYWORDS
Cell death

Zinc oxide

Nanowires

Fiber optics sensors

Sensors

Nanosensors

Microscopes

Back to Top