Open Access
2 January 2023 Anomalous broadband Floquet topological metasurface with pure site rings
Zhiwei Guo, Xian Wu, Yong Sun, Haitao Jiang, Ya-Qiong Ding, Yunhui Li, Yewen Zhang, Hong Chen
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Photonic and acoustic topological insulators exhibiting one-way transportation that is robust against defects and impurities are typically realized in coupled arrays of two-dimensional ring resonators. These systems have produced a series of applications, including optical isolators, delay lines, and lasers. However, the structures are complicated because an additional coupler ring between neighboring rings is needed to construct photonic pseudospin. A photonic anomalous Floquet topological insulator is proposed and experimentally demonstrated in the microwave regime. This improved design takes advantage of the efficient and backward coupling of negative-index media. The results contribute to the understanding of topological structures in metamaterials and point toward a unique direction for constructing useful topological photonic devices.

1.

Introduction

Edge modes of photonic topological insulators, which travel along the boundary of the structure and are robust against perturbations, have recently become a subject of much interest.13 Although early designs for photonic topological one-way edge modes involved breaking the time-reversal (T-reversal) symmetry in gyromagnetic materials using an external magnetic field,47 it was soon discovered that a synthetic magnetic field could exhibit the same effect as a real magnetic field in producing one-way edge modes.810 Much like the topological insulators in electric systems,11,12 T-reversal symmetry preserved photonic systems with nontrivial topological phases have attracted considerable interest from researchers. Such systems have been realized in a variety of structures, including bi-anisotropic metamaterials,1317 photonic crystals,1823 and arrays of coupled ring resonators (CRRs).2436 Great progress in topological photonics has extended its scope from microwave to X-ray frequencies,37 passive to active structures,38,39 near-field to far-field measurement,40,41 short-range to long-range coupling,4244 one to higher dimensions,4547 and classical to quantum optics.4850

Diversified CRR arrays, which provide a suitable platform for the study of topological photonics, have received substantial attention. The roles of pseudospins in opposite directions are played by the clockwise and anticlockwise propagation directions of light.2432 High-performance topological optical devices based on CRR arrays, such as delay lines,24 optical isolators,28 and lasers,31,32 have been proposed as key components for optical communication systems. Liang and Chong26 demonstrated theoretically that a lattice of optical ring resonators can exhibit a topological insulator phase even if all bands have a zero Chern number. Unlike earlier designs that required delicately tuning the aperiodic couplings of the interresonators,24,25 this simplified structure is periodic and contains identical CRRs.26,27 Inspired by this anomalous Floquet topological insulator, topological edge states with T-symmetry have been experimentally measured using a surface plasmon structure.30 This novel topological edge mode has also been demonstrated in acoustic systems.51,52 However, the coupling between the site rings in CRR arrays needs to be very strong for the realization of an anomalous Floquet topological insulator.26 At present, the typical solution is to insert a coupler ring between two site rings. Achieving strong coupling relies on the resonance of the coupler ring, which severely limits the bandwidth of the strong coupling regime.29 In addition, the CRR array design is complicated by the requirement of an additional coupler ring between the nearest neighboring rings to construct the photonic pseudospin.2436 Thus, a question naturally arises: can an anomalous Floquet topological insulator be constructed without additional coupler rings and with a broad bandwidth? In particular, Afzal et al.53,54 theoretically proposed and experimentally demonstrated that the anomalous Floquet insulators, in which the unit cell was composed of four CRRs, can occur using a square lattice of direct-coupled octagonal resonators, owing to the unequal synchronous coupling and asynchronous coupling. Their remarkable findings discovered that the natural spin flipping can be used to realize the anomalous Floquet topological insulators.

Metamaterials/metasurfaces, artificial materials composed of subwavelength unit cells, provide a powerful platform for manipulating the propagation of light. The backward and efficient coupling mechanism of left-handed media (LHM) can also be used to solve the above problems.5558 Recently, high-performance metasurfaces have been constructed to achieve the required optical response in transmission line (TL) platforms and have enabled extensive applications, such as cloaking,59 hyperbolic dispersion,60,61 quantum-optics-like phenomena,62,63 and topological photonics.21 Utilizing a TL system, in this work we design circuit-based negative-index media in the microwave regime. An improved anomalous Floquet topological insulator is constructed from a square array of CRRs composed of composite right/left-handed (CRLH) TLs. In each individual ring resonator, the roles of opposite pseudospins are played by the clockwise and anticlockwise propagation of electromagnetic waves. A directional coupler inserted into the site rings supports backward wave coupling without requiring additional coupler rings. A photonic anomalous Floquet topological metasurface with pure site rings is observed in both numerical simulations and experiments. We also investigate the robustness of edge states against perturbations in the structure. For the anomalous Floquet topological insulator, CRR array design is usually complicated because it needs to add a coupler ring between the nearest adjacent rings to construct photon pseudo-spin. Therefore, the anomalous Floquet topological metasurface with pure site rings shown in this work looks simpler because there are fewer rings. Our findings not only provide a useful understanding for studying topological structures using metamaterials, but also may offer a new means of realizing topological photonic devices.

2.

Design and Method

The near-field directional coupling between resonance rings plays an important role in the realization of Floquet topological structures.2428 The novel negative refractive property of LHM can serve in the abnormal backward coupling. For the rings with normal right-handed material (RHM), the conservation condition of the tangential wave vector imposes forward coupling for the RHM rings, as shown schematically in Fig. 1(a). It can be clearly seen that the pseudo-spin will flip in a forward coupling; thus, a coupled ring needs to be inserted between the site rings to ensure that the pseudospin in the site rings is maintained. However, the coupling direction is reversed when one of the rings is composed of LHM, as schematically shown in Fig. 1(b). As opposed to the forward coupling shown in Fig. 1(a), the backward-coupling-enabled consistent pseudospin in site rings paves a new way to design topological structures.

Fig. 1

Schematics of the photonic pseudospin in the coupled ring system. (a) Reversal of pseudo-spin in forward coupling. (b) Consistency of pseudo-spins in the process of backward coupling. The upper (lower) row denotes pseudo-spin-down (up) mode. RHM and LHM are marked by pink and yellow, respectively.

APN_2_1_016006_f001.png

In the circuit-based system, the relationship between the electric and magnetic fields can be easily mapped using the relationship between voltage and current. As a result, the electromagnetic response is equivalent to the circuit parameters. The structure factor of the TL is defined as g=Z0/ηeff, where Z0 and ηeff denote the characteristic impedance and effective wave impedance, respectively. For the TL model of the LHM in Fig. 2(a), the structure factor is g=[1.393+w/h+0.667ln(w/h)+1.444]1. The impedance and admittance of the circuit are represented by Z and Y, respectively. The direction of the magnetic field produced by the current can be determined from Ampere’s law, as shown in Fig. 2(b). By mapping the circuit equation (telegraph equation) to Maxwell’s equations, the relationship between circuit and electromagnetic parameters can be described by μeffμ0g=Z/iω and εeffε0/g=Y/iω, respectively. ε0 and μ0 are the vacuum permittivity and permeability, respectively. ω is the angular frequency. The effective permittivity and permeability of the circuit system can be tuned using the lumped elements in the circuit. Figure 2(c) shows a simple effective circuit model for a circuit-based hyperbolic metamaterial. In this circuit model, the admittance and impedance are Y=iωCR+1/iωLL and Z=iωLR+1/iωCL, respectively. CR and LR denote the capacitance and inductance per unit length, respectively. Therefore, the effective electromagnetic parameters of the circuit-based LHM are εeff=(CR1/ω2·LL)g/ε0 and μeff=(LR1/ω2·CL)/gμ0, respectively. Especially, the LHM can be realized when εeff<0 and μeff<0.

Fig. 2

Realization of circuit-based LHM. (a) Schematic of circuit-based LHM realized in the TL platform; the structural parameters are given in Supplementary Material. (b) TL model of the circuit-based LHM. (c) Corresponding circuit model of the effective LHM.

APN_2_1_016006_f002.png

A schematic of an array of CRLH ring resonators forming an anomalous Floquet topological insulator is shown in Fig. 3. Distributed CRLH TLs54,55 are used to design a LHM with a negative refraction index. The ring resonator can then be constructed by connecting left- and right-handed TLs in sequence. A square array of coupled CRLH ring resonators can be produced by arranging the resonators in close proximity. The size of the fabricated sample is 340.4  mm×272.3  mm. Unlike previous anomalous Floquet topological insulators, in which additional resonators were adopted as coupler rings,2436 every ring resonator in the improved platform belongs to a site ring, as shown in Fig. 3. Two U-shaped waveguides serve as input and output ports. In the improved platform, the site rings are backward-coupled with their neighbors through the vortex-like interface mode existing in the CRLH coupler, as shown in Fig. 1(b). This provides considerable advantages, such as high coupling strength and broad bandwidth.5558 It is the mechanism of backward coupling that prevents the electromagnetic waves from being coupled back to the input ring after one coupling process, which greatly increases the coupling efficiency.5558 Additional coupler rings are not required in anomalous Floquet topological insulators based on left-handed metamaterials. Details of the structural parameters, effective circuit models, and the design scheme of the negative-index media are given in the Supplementary Material. When circular ring is considered instead of square ring in Fig. 3, the coupling of adjacent rings will change from line coupling to point coupling, which leads to the characteristics of narrowband coupling. As a result, the number of bandgaps will also change. Especially, it should be emphasized that when considering other shapes with effective line coupling, such as octagonal ring resonators,53,54 the related results are maintained.

Fig. 3

Schematic of anomalous Floquet topological insulator based on CRLH ring resonators. The size of our fabricated sample is 4×5 unit cells. The RHM (simple line strips) and left-handed material (complex branched strips) connect successively in a ring structure. The zoom-in picture of different ring resonators is presented on the top. The arrows represent the coupling direction of the energy flow in two materials with different handedness. The upper metallic microstrip and the lower dielectric substrate are marked by yellow and green, respectively.

APN_2_1_016006_f003.png

The band structure of the proposed array of CRLH ring resonators can be calculated as follows. A schematic of the coupling network constructed by resonance rings is shown in Fig. 4(a). The position of the resonance rings and the relationship between the wave amplitudes are indicated by square green boxes and red arrows, respectively. To determine the backward coupling between RHM and LHM waveguides, we first study the simple configuration of thre UU waveguide structure, as shown in Fig. 4(b). Using the computer simulation technology Microwave Studio software, the backward coupling is simulated; the corresponding electric field distribution is shown in Fig. 4(c). The amplitudes of the waves in the ring resonators are expressed in the form of a scattering matrix26,

Eq. (1)

S(θ,χ)=eiχ[sinθicosθicosθsinθ],
where θ denotes the coupling strength between adjacent lattice rings and χ is the overall phase factor. The highly dispersive behavior of θ, plotted in Fig. 4(d), is written as

Eq. (2)

θ=sin1[(Iout/Iin)1/2],
which is derived from the UU shape structure in Fig. 4(c). Iin and Iout denote the power through the incident and transmitted waveguides, respectively. The green region marked in Fig. 4(d) covers the frequency range for strong coupling, where θ>π/4; the nontrivial topological phase exists in this range.2630 Edge states can be observed in a semi-infinite strip-coupled rings lattice, whose width is finite in the y direction and periodic in the x direction. The positions of lattice rings are indicated by n=(xn,yn), where xn and yn are the column and row indices, respectively. The coupling between the lattice rings at sites n and n+x (n+y) in the x (y) direction is expressed by the scattering matrices Sx (Sy),

Eq. (3)

Sx[anbn+x]=[dn+xcn],Sy[dncn+y]=[bn+yan]e2iϕ,
where ϕ denotes the phase delay accumulated in the propagation through a quarter-lattice ring. The Bloch condition can be applied in the x direction for the periodic condition |φn+x=eiKx|φn. Combining this with the boundary conditions in the y direction, c1=e2iϕb1 and aN=e2iϕdN, the equation for the eigenvalues is obtained26,

Eq. (4)

[M1xM2xMNx]·[e2iϕM1yMN1ye2iϕ]·ψ=eiKx|Ψ,
where |ψ=[b1d1bNdN]T and the submatrices are

Eq. (5)

Mix=[cscθicotθicotθcscθ](i=1,2,,N),Mjy=[ie2iϕsecθitanθitanθie2iϕsecθ](j=1,2,,N1).

Fig. 4

Band structure and the edge states of the anomalous Floquet topological insulator. (a) Schematic of couplings between neighboring resonance rings, where the wave amplitude relations are marked by red arrows. (b) Configuration of UU waveguide structure. The incident wave with high performance is coupled to the transmitted port based on the wave vector conservation condition for back direction. (c) Simulated backward coupling between RHM and LHM waveguides. (d) The value of coupling strength θ (red line) and the corresponding coupling phase (blue dashed line) can be derived from the UU shape structure. (e) The projected band diagram of a semi-infinite strip-coupled ring lattice, whose width is finite in the y direction (N=30) and periodic in the x direction. Gapless edge modes periodically appear in the bandgap range of the infinite periodic structure. Red and green lines denote edge states corresponding to the upper and lower edges of the sample, respectively.

APN_2_1_016006_f004.png

According to Eqs. (4) and (5), gapless edge modes appear in the bandgap range, as shown in Fig. 4(e). The red and green lines denote edge states corresponding to the upper and lower edges. The emergence of a topological edge state is one of the most striking properties of topological insulators. Anomalous Floquet topological metasurfaces in all three different frequency bandgap ranges belong to a topological nontrivial phases. Due to the topological protection, edge states in three different frequency bandgap ranges have robust transmission characteristics that the electromagnetic waves can still propagate along the rugged boundary with little reflection.

We next demonstrate the improved photonic anomalous Floquet topological insulator. Each individual ring resonator possesses twofold degenerate modes, corresponding to a twofold pseudo-spin degree of freedom in which the clockwise and anticlockwise propagation directions of light play the role of the opposite pseudo-spins. By choosing the appropriate input port, clockwise and anticlockwise circulating photonic modes (e.g., two types of pseudospin) can be selected. As a result, two one-way edge modes can be excited along opposite directions. Figure 5 shows the results of full wave simulations of the electric field (Ez) distributions of the edge states. When the upper arm of the incident U-shaped waveguide [marked by the red arrow in Fig. 5(a)] is selected as the input port, the spin-up edge mode is excited with a working frequency of 2.5 GHz. Owing to the spin–orbit coupling, the wave is transmitted to the output port only along the upper portion of the array structure. The electric field distribution of the Ez component is shown in Fig. 5(a). Similarly, when the lower arm of the incident U-shaped waveguide [marked by the blue arrow in Fig. 5(b)] is chosen as the input port, the spin-down edge mode is selectively excited and the wave is transmitted only along the lower portion of the array structure, as shown in Fig. 5(b). More details regarding the robustness of the topological edge states are discussed in the Supplementary Material. Our results provide a way to design the novel topological photonic devices with excellent performance using the negative-index media.

Fig. 5

Simulated electric field Ez distributions of the topological edge states at 2.5 GHz. (a) Simulated Ez distribution when pseudo-spin-up edge state is selectively excited and the electromagnetic wave transports along the upper edge of the structure. (b) Similar to (a), but for the one-way pseudo-spin-down edge state. In this case, the electromagnetic wave is transmitted along the lower edge of the structure.

APN_2_1_016006_f005.png

The experimental sample based on TLs is constructed according to the scheme in Fig. 3. The experimental setup is shown in Fig. 6(a). The signals are generated by a vector network analyzer (Agilent PNA Network Analyzer N5222A) and then input to the sample, which functions as the source for the system. The normalized transmission spectra for the pseudospin-up (red line) and pseudospin-down (blue dashed line) cases are shown in Fig. 6(b). The broadband nature of the topological edge states is indicated by the three bands with high transmittance, consistent with the dispersion relation in Fig. 4(e). In our experiments, the samples are placed on an automatic translation device, allowing the field distribution to be accurately probed using a near-field scanning measurement. The signal is generated from input of a vector network analyzer. A monopole antenna connected to output of the analyzer serves as a near-field probe to record the electric field distribution. The antenna has a length of 1 mm and is placed vertically 1 mm above the TLs to measure the signal from the electric fields of the TLs in the two-dimensional (2D) plane. The spatial distribution of the near field is scanned in steps of 1 mm in both the x and y directions. The field amplitudes are normalized according to their respective maximum amplitudes. Two frequencies of edge states 2.56 and 2.92 GHz are chosen, marked by the green dashed lines in Fig. 6(b). The edge state at 2.56 GHz with pseudospin-up propagates along the upper edge while the edge state with pseudospin-down propagates along the lower edge, as shown in Figs. 6(c) and 6(d), respectively. Similar to Figs. 6(c) and 6(d), the measured electric field Ez distributions of two edge states at 2.92 GHz are shown in Figs. 6(e) and 6(f), respectively. The observed decay of the topological edge states mainly arises from the absorption in the CRLH TLs. Our results not only provide a useful understanding for studying topological structures using metamaterials, but also may pave the way toward realizing broadband topological photonic devices with topological protection in the microwave regime. Furthermore, using the mechanisms of multiple scattering in single negative metamaterials64,65 or the effective negative coupling coefficient,6668 our design also can be extended to higher frequencies and acoustical systems. In particular, the robustness of topological edge states, such as immunity to structural defects and the ability to pass through sharp corners, is of great interest in the field of microwave engineering. Compared with more traditional microwave devices, whose performance is largely limited by the fabrication difficulty and the tolerance of structural accuracy, photonic devices based on topological edge states have a high tolerance for structural defects and interference. For example, it is well known that sharp bending of coaxial TLs should be strictly avoided in the microwave regime. However, the topological protection mode is not sensitive to the backscattering caused by structural defects. In general, the robustness of the topological edge state makes the photonic topological structure an excellent platform for realizing unique microwave devices, such as isolators, circulators, antennas, delay lines, couplers, and power dividers.69

Fig. 6

Experiment setup and observed topological edge states. (a) Photo and diagram of experimental setup for the measurement of the vertical electric field distributions. Our experimental setup is composed of a vector network analyzer, a three-dimensional mobile stage, and the sample to be measured. The sample is put on a 2-cm-thick foam substrate with a permittivity of near 1. The electric probe is a home-made rod antenna, which is connected to the output port of the vector network analyzer. (b) Measured normalized transmission spectra of pseudo-spin-up (red line) and pseudo-spin-down (blue dotted line) cases based on the configuration in panel (a). Measured 2D vertical electric field Ez distributions of the one-way edge states at (c), (d) 2.56 GHz and (e), (f) 2.92 GHz. The exciting position of the pseudo-spin-up (pseudo-spin-down) edge state is marked by the red (blue) arrow.

APN_2_1_016006_f006.png

3.

Conclusion

In summary, using circuit-based LHM in a TL system, we propose an improved platform to produce an anomalous Floquet topological insulator in a square array of CRLH ring resonators. Additional coupler rings are not necessary, and the resulting topological edge state is broadband in nature. The robustness of topological edge states against a variety of defects has also been verified. Our experimental demonstration of selectively excited one-way edge states will further enrich the design of anomalous Floquet topological insulators and may pave the way toward designing novel photonic topological devices. Moreover, our methods have the potential to explore the topological properties in non-Hermitian systems,70 which may be useful for some applications, such as beam splitters71 and funneling of energy.72

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the financial support from the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2021YFA1400602), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 12004284, 11974261, 91850206, and 61621001), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. 22120210579), and the Shanghai Chenguang Plan (Grant No. 21CGA22). The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

1. 

L. Lu, J. D. Joannopoulos and M. Soljačić, “Topological photonics,” Nat. Photonics, 8 821 –829 https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2014.248 NPAHBY 1749-4885 (2014). Google Scholar

2. 

A. B. Khanikaev and G. Shvets, “Two-dimensional topological photonics,” Nat. Photonics, 11 763 –773 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-017-0048-5 NPAHBY 1749-4885 (2017). Google Scholar

3. 

T. Ozawa et al., “Topological photonics,” Rev. Mod. Phys., 91 015006 https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.91.015006 RMPHAT 0034-6861 (2019). Google Scholar

4. 

F. D. M. Haldane and S. Raghu, “Possible realization of directional optical waveguides in photonic crystals with broken time-reversal symmetry,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 100 013904 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.013904 PRLTAO 0031-9007 (2008). Google Scholar

5. 

Z. Wang et al., “Reflection-free one-way edge modes in a gyromagnetic photonic crystal,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 100 013905 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.013905 PRLTAO 0031-9007 (2008). Google Scholar

6. 

Z. Wang et al., “Observation of unidirectional backscattering-immune topological electromagnetic states,” Nature, 461 772 –775 https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08293 (2009). Google Scholar

7. 

Y. Poo et al., “Experimental realization of self-guiding unidirectional electromagnetic edge states,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 106 093903 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.093903 PRLTAO 0031-9007 (2011). Google Scholar

8. 

K. Fang, Z. Yu and S. Fan, “Realizing effective magnetic field for photons by controlling the phase of dynamic modulation,” Nat. Photonics, 6 782 –787 https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2012.236 NPAHBY 1749-4885 (2012). Google Scholar

9. 

M. C. Rechtsman et al., “Photonic Floquet topological insulators,” Nature, 496 196 https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12066 (2013). Google Scholar

10. 

A. B. Khanikaev, “Optical physics: on-chip synthetic magnetic field,” Nat. Photonics, 7 941 –943 https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2013.321 NPAHBY 1749-4885 (2013). Google Scholar

11. 

C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele, “Topological order and the quantum spin Hall effect,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 95 146802 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.146802 PRLTAO 0031-9007 (2005). Google Scholar

12. 

C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele, “Quantum spin Hall effect in graphene,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 95 226801 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.226801 PRLTAO 0031-9007 (2005). Google Scholar

13. 

A. B. Khanikaev et al., “Photonic topological insulators,” Nat. Mater., 12 233 –239 https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3520 NMAACR 1476-1122 (2013). Google Scholar

14. 

T. Ma et al., “Guiding electromagnetic waves around sharp corners: topologically protected photonic transport in metawaveguides,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 114 127401 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.127401 PRLTAO 0031-9007 (2015). Google Scholar

15. 

X. J. Cheng et al., “Robust reconfigurable electromagnetic pathways within a photonic topological insulator,” Nat. Mater., 15 542 –548 https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4573 NMAACR 1476-1122 (2016). Google Scholar

16. 

C. He et al., “Photonic topological insulator with broken time-reversal symmetry,” 4924 –4928 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1525502113 Google Scholar

17. 

J. W. Dong et al., “Valley photonic crystals for control of spin and topology,” Nat. Mater., 16 298 –302 https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4807 NMAACR 1476-1122 (2017). Google Scholar

18. 

L. H. Wu and X. Hu, “Scheme for achieving a topological photonic crystal by using dielectric material,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 114 223901 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.223901 PRLTAO 0031-9007 (2015). Google Scholar

19. 

Y. Yang et al., “Visualization of a unidirectional electromagnetic waveguide using topological photonic crystals made of dielectric materials,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 120 21740 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.217401 PRLTAO 0031-9007 (2018). Google Scholar

20. 

X. Zhu et al., “Topological transitions in continuously deformed photonic crystals,” Phys. Rev. B, 97 085148 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.97.085148 (2018). Google Scholar

21. 

Y. Li et al., “Topological LC-circuits based on microstrips and observation of electromagnetic modes with orbital angular momentum,” Nat. Commun., 9 4598 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07084-2 NCAOBW 2041-1723 (2018). Google Scholar

22. 

S. Yves et al., “Crystalline metamaterials for topological properties at subwavelength scales,” Nat. Commun., 8 16023 https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms16023 NCAOBW 2041-1723 (2017). Google Scholar

23. 

S. Peng et al., “Probing the band structure of topological silicon photonic lattices in the visible spectrum,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 122 117401 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.117401 PRLTAO 0031-9007 (2019). Google Scholar

24. 

M. Hafezi et al., “Robust optical delay lines with topological protection,” Nat. Phys., 7 907 –912 https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys2063 NPAHAX 1745-2473 (2011). Google Scholar

25. 

M. Hafezi et al., “Imaging topological edge states in silicon photonics,” Nat. Photonics, 7 1001 –1005 https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2013.274 NPAHBY 1749-4885 (2013). Google Scholar

26. 

G. Q. Liang and Y. D. Chong, “Optical resonator analog of a two-dimensional topological insulator,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 110 203904 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.203904 PRLTAO 0031-9007 (2013). Google Scholar

27. 

M. Pasek and Y. D. Chong, “Network models of photonic Floquet topological insulators,” Phys. Rev. B, 89 075113 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.89.075113 (2014). Google Scholar

28. 

X. Zhou et al., “Optical isolation with nonlinear topological photonics,” New J. Phys., 19 095002 https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/aa7cb5 NJOPFM 1367-2630 (2017). Google Scholar

29. 

Y. G. Peng et al., “Low-loss and broadband anomalous Floquet topological insulator for airborne sound,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 110 173505 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4982620 APPLAB 0003-6951 (2017). Google Scholar

30. 

F. Gao et al., “Probing the limits of topological protection in a designer surface plasmon structure,” Nat. Commun., 7 11619 https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11619 NCAOBW 2041-1723 (2016). Google Scholar

31. 

G. Harari et al., “Topological insulator laser: theory,” Science, 359 eaar4003 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar4003 SCIEAS 0036-8075 (2018). Google Scholar

32. 

M. A. Bandres et al., “Topological insulator laser: experiments,” Science, 359 eaar4005 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar4005 SCIEAS 0036-8075 (2018). Google Scholar

33. 

X. Y. Zhu et al., “Z2 topological edge state in honeycomb lattice of coupled resonant optical waveguides with a flat band,” Opt. Express, 26 24307 https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.26.024307 OPEXFF 1094-4087 (2018). Google Scholar

34. 

Y. T. Ao et al., “Topological properties of coupled resonator array based on accurate band structure,” Phys. Rev. Mater., 2 105201 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.2.105201 PRBMDO 0163-1829 (2018). Google Scholar

35. 

H. Zhao et al., “Non-Hermitian topological light steering,” Science, 365 1163 –1166 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay1064 SCIEAS 0036-8075 (2019). Google Scholar

36. 

S. Mittal et al., “Photonic quadrupole topological phases,” Nat. Photonics, 13 692 –696 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-019-0452-0 NPAHBY 1749-4885 (2019). Google Scholar

37. 

Q. S. Huang et al., “Observation of the topological edge state in x-ray band,” Laser Photonics Rev., 13 1800339 https://doi.org/10.1002/lpor.201800339 (2019). Google Scholar

38. 

Z. K. Shao et al., “A high-performance topological bulk laser based on band-inversion-induced reflection,” Nat. Nanotechnol., 15 67 –72 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-019-0584-x NNAABX 1748-3387 (2019). Google Scholar

39. 

D. Smirnova et al., “Third-harmonic generation in photonic topological metasurfaces,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 123 103901 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.103901 PRLTAO 0031-9007 (2019). Google Scholar

40. 

M. A. Gorlach et al., “Far-field probing of leaky topological states in all dielectric metasurfaces,” Nat. Commun., 9 909 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03330-9 NCAOBW 2041-1723 (2018). Google Scholar

41. 

A. Slobozhanyuk et al., “Near-field imaging of spin-locked edge states in all-dielectric topological metasurfaces,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 114 031103 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5055601 APPLAB 0003-6951 (2019). Google Scholar

42. 

D. Leykam et al., “Reconfigurable topological phases in next-nearest-neighbor coupled resonator lattices,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 121 023901 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.023901 PRLTAO 0031-9007 (2018). Google Scholar

43. 

S. Mittal et al., “Photonic anomalous quantum Hall effect,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 123 043201 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.043201 PRLTAO 0031-9007 (2019). Google Scholar

44. 

M. Li et al., “Higher-order topological states in photonic kagome crystals with long-range interactions,” Nat. Photonics, 14 89 –94 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-019-0561-9 NPAHBY 1749-4885 (2020). Google Scholar

45. 

Y. H. Yang et al., “Realization of a three-dimensional photonic topological insulator,” Nature, 565 622 –626 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0829-0 (2019). Google Scholar

46. 

H. Jia et al., “Observation of chiral zero mode in inhomogeneous three-dimensional Weyl metamaterials,” Science, 363 148 –151 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau7707 SCIEAS 0036-8075 (2019). Google Scholar

47. 

B. Yang et al., “Ideal Weyl points and helicoid surface states in artificial photonic crystal structures,” Science, 359 1013 –1016 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaq1221 SCIEAS 0036-8075 (2018). Google Scholar

48. 

J. Perczel et al., “Topological quantum optics in two-dimensional atomic arrays,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 119 023603 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.023603 PRLTAO 0031-9007 (2017). Google Scholar

49. 

S. Barik et al., “A topological quantum optics interface,” Science, 359 666 –668 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaq0327 SCIEAS 0036-8075 (2018). Google Scholar

50. 

S. Mittal, E. A. Goldschmidt and M. Hafezi, “A topological source of quantum light,” Nature, 561 502 –506 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0478-3 (2018). Google Scholar

51. 

C. He et al., “Topological phononic states of underwater sound based on coupled ring resonators,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 108 031904 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4940403 APPLAB 0003-6951 (2016). Google Scholar

52. 

Y. G. Peng et al., “Experimental demonstration of anomalous Floquet topological insulator for sound,” Nat. Commun., 7 13368 https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13368 NCAOBW 2041-1723 (2016). Google Scholar

53. 

S. Afzal and V. Van, “Topological phases and the bulk-edge correspondence in 2D photonic microring resonator lattices,” Opt. Express, 26 14567 –14577 https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.26.014567 OPEXFF 1094-4087 (2018). Google Scholar

54. 

S. Afzal et al., “Realization of anomalous Floquet insulators in strongly coupled nanophotonic lattices,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 124 253601 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.253601 PRLTAO 0031-9007 (2020). Google Scholar

55. 

R. Islam and G. V. Eleftheriades, “A planar metamaterial co-directional coupler that couples power backwards,” in IEEE MTT-S Int. Microw. Symp. Dig., 321 –324, IEEE (2003). https://doi.org/10.1109/MWSYM.2003.1210943 Google Scholar

56. 

C. Caloz and T. Itoh, “A novel mixed conventional microstrip and composite right/left-handed backward-wave directional coupler with broadband and tight coupling characteristics,” IEEE Microw. Wirel. Compon. Lett., 14 31 –33 https://doi.org/10.1109/LMWC.2003.821506 IMWCBJ 1531-1309 (2004). Google Scholar

57. 

A. Lai, T. Itoh and C. Caloz, “Composite right/left-handed transmission line metamaterials,” IEEE Microw. Mag., 5 34 –50 https://doi.org/10.1109/MMW.2004.1337766 1527-3342 (2004). Google Scholar

58. 

Y. Z. Wang et al., “Time-domain study of vortexlike interface mode in metamaterials,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 91 221907 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2818677 APPLAB 0003-6951 (2007). Google Scholar

59. 

Z. W. Guo et al., “Focusing and super-resolution with partial cloaking based on linear-crossing metamaterials,” Phys. Rev. Appl., 10 064048 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.10.064048 PRAHB2 2331-7019 (2018). Google Scholar

60. 

Z. W. Guo et al., “Anomalous unidirectional excitation of high-k hyperbolic modes using all-electric metasources,” Adv. Photonics, 036001 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.AP.3.3.036001 AOPAC7 1943-8206 (2021). Google Scholar

61. 

Z. W. Guo, H. T. Jiang and H. Chen, “Zero-index and hyperbolic metacavities: fundamentals and applications,” J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 55 083001 https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/ac2e89 JPAPBE 0022-3727 (2022). Google Scholar

62. 

Y. Sun et al., “Experimental demonstration of a coherent perfect absorber with PT phase transition,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 112 143903 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.143903 PRLTAO 0031-9007 (2014). Google Scholar

63. 

Z. W. Guo et al., “Enhancement of electromagnetically induced transparency in metamaterials using long range coupling mediated by a hyperbolic material,” Opt. Express, 26 627 –641 https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.26.000627 OPEXFF 1094-4087 (2018). Google Scholar

64. 

N. Kaina et al., “Negative refractive index and acoustic superlens from multiple scattering in single negative metamaterials,” Nature, 525 77 –81 https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14678 (2015). Google Scholar

65. 

Z. W. Guo et al., “Photonic spin Hall effect in waveguides composed of two types of single-negative metamaterials,” Sci. Rep., 7 7742 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-08171-y SRCEC3 2045-2322 (2017). Google Scholar

66. 

Y. K. Zhou et al., “Acoustic multiband double negativity from coupled single-negative resonators,” Phys. Rev. Appl., 10 044006 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.10.044006 PRAHB2 2331-7019 (2018). Google Scholar

67. 

R. Keil et al., “Universal sign control of coupling in tight-binding lattices,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 116 213901 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.213901 PRLTAO 0031-9007 (2016). Google Scholar

68. 

Z. Liao et al., “Localized surface magnetic modes propagating along a chain of connected subwavelength metamaterial resonators,” Phys. Rev. Appl., 10 034054 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.10.034054 PRAHB2 2331-7019 (2018). Google Scholar

69. 

S. Ma and S. M. Anlage, “Microwave applications of photonic topological insulators,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 116 250502 https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0008046 APPLAB 0003-6951 (2020). Google Scholar

70. 

S. Y. Yao and Z. Wang, “Edge states and topological invariants of non-Hermitian systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 121 086803 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.086803 PRLTAO 0031-9007 (2018). Google Scholar

71. 

X. Y. Zhu et al., “Photonic non-Hermitian skin effect and non-Bloch bulk-boundary correspondence,” Phys. Rev. Res., 2 013280 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.013280 PRSTCR 1554-9178 (2020). Google Scholar

72. 

S. Weidemann et al., “Topological funneling of light,” Science, 368 311 –314 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz8727 SCIEAS 0036-8075 (2020). Google Scholar

Biography

Zhiwei Guo received his PhD in physics from Tongji University in 2019. Currently, he is a assistant professor in the School of Physics Science and Engineering at Tongji University. His current research interests include non-Hermitian photonics, topological photonics, circuit-based metamaterials, photonic crystals with metamaterials, metasources for near-field routing, and wireless power transfer.

Biographies of the other authors are not available.

CC BY: © The Authors. Published by SPIE and CLP under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI.
Zhiwei Guo, Xian Wu, Yong Sun, Haitao Jiang, Ya-Qiong Ding, Yunhui Li, Yewen Zhang, and Hong Chen "Anomalous broadband Floquet topological metasurface with pure site rings," Advanced Photonics Nexus 2(1), 016006 (2 January 2023). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.APN.2.1.016006
Received: 11 October 2022; Accepted: 6 December 2022; Published: 2 January 2023
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 2 scholarly publications.
Advertisement
Advertisement
KEYWORDS
Dielectrics

Design and modelling

Resonators

Electric fields

Microwave radiation

Thallium

Waveguides

Back to Top