Paper
27 September 2012 Generic misalignment aberration patterns and the subspace of benign misalignment
Paul L. Schechter, Rebecca Sobel Levinson
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
Q1: Why deploy N wavefront sensors on a three mirror anastigmat (TMA) and not N + 1? Q2: Why measure M Zernike coefficients and not M + 1? Q3: Why control L rigid body degrees of freedom (total) on the secondary and tertiary and not L + 1? The usual answer: “We did a lot of ray tracing and N, M, and L seemed OK.” We show how straightforward results from aberration theory may be used to address these questions. We consider, in particular, the case of a three mirror anastigmat.
© (2012) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Paul L. Schechter and Rebecca Sobel Levinson "Generic misalignment aberration patterns and the subspace of benign misalignment", Proc. SPIE 8444, Ground-based and Airborne Telescopes IV, 844455 (27 September 2012); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.925075
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 2 scholarly publications.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Monochromatic aberrations

Mirrors

Telescopes

Wavefront sensors

Space telescopes

Ray tracing

Astronomical telescopes

Back to Top