Paper
12 July 2008 Spitzer Science operations: the good, the bad, and the ugly
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
We review the Spitzer Space Telescope Science Center operations teams and processes and their interfaces with other Project elements -- what we planned early in the development of the science center, what we had at a launch and what we have now and why. We also explore the checks and balances behind building an organizational structure that supports constructive airing of conflicts and a timely resolution that balances the inputs and provides for very efficient on-orbit operations. For example, what organizational roles are involved in reviewing observing schedules, what constituency do they represent and who has authority to approve or disapprove the schedule.
© (2008) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Deborah A. Levine "Spitzer Science operations: the good, the bad, and the ugly", Proc. SPIE 7016, Observatory Operations: Strategies, Processes, and Systems II, 70160C (12 July 2008); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.789871
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Lead

Observatories

Space operations

Databases

Space telescopes

Calibration

Safety

RELATED CONTENT

Spitzer scheduling challenges: cold and warm
Proceedings of SPIE (July 12 2008)
Edison: a new direction for infrared space astronomy
Proceedings of SPIE (September 13 1994)
Overview of the Atlas SIRTF Mission
Proceedings of SPIE (July 15 1993)
The Spitzer science operations system how well are we...
Proceedings of SPIE (October 12 2004)

Back to Top