Sensitivity and image quality of resists with electron-beam, ion-beam, and optical exposure

Nicholas N. Rau; Andrew R. Neureuther; Taro Ogawa; Randall L. Kubena; Fred P. Stratton; Charles H. Fields; C. Grant Willson

doi:10.1117/12.312465

29 June 1998 Sensitivity and image quality of resists with electron-beam, ion-beam, and optical exposure

Nicholas N. Rau, Andrew R. Neureuther, Taro Ogawa, Randall L. Kubena, Fred P. Stratton, Charles H. Fields, C. Grant Willson

Author Affiliations +

Proceedings Volume 3333, Advances in Resist Technology and Processing XV; (1998) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.312465
Event: 23rd Annual International Symposium on Microlithography, 1998, Santa Clara, CA, United States

Abstract

Chemically-amplified resists show promise as patterning materials in many advanced lithography systems including optical, electron-beam and ion-beam systems. In this study, four such resists including IBM APEX-E, IBM ENR, Shipley UVIIHS, and Shipley SAL-601 (ion-beam and electron-beam exposure only) were characterized for the three methods of exposure to determine relative sensitivities, fundamental resolution limits, and diffusivity for each of the above mentioned exposure methods. It was discovered that volumetric exposure doses for ion-beam and electron-beam were roughly equivalent but all resists were more sensitive to optical exposure. This is most likely due to a difference in transfer of energy to the photoacid generator during the exposure. Resolution tests were conducted in ion-beam exposure with simple line/space array patterns. All resists demonstrated patterning capability with resolution limits of 150 nm, 70 nm, 70 nm, and 50 nm for APEX-E, SAL-601, UVIIHS, and ENR respectively. Evidence of a competing cross-linking mechanism in the positive tone resists was discovered from the resolution tests. From a simple electron-beam `post/hole' experiment with varying post-exposure bake times, it was determined that SAL-601 and APEX-E demonstrated the highest level of diffusivity while UVIIHS and ENR exhibited negligible levels of diffusion. The characterization tests demonstrated the suitability of all four resists as good ion-beam patterning materials in addition to their suitability for electron-beam and optical exposure.

Citation Download Citation

Nicholas N. Rau, Andrew R. Neureuther, Taro Ogawa, Randall L. Kubena, Fred P. Stratton, Charles H. Fields, and C. Grant Willson "Sensitivity and image quality of resists with electron-beam, ion-beam, and optical exposure", Proc. SPIE 3333, Advances in Resist Technology and Processing XV, (29 June 1998); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.312465

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available