Comparison of EBR-900 M1 and ZEP 7000 with plasma-etch processing for MEBES 4500S

Thomas P. Coleman; David W. Alexander; Maiying Lu

doi:10.1117/12.301211

12 February 1997 Comparison of EBR-900 M1 and ZEP 7000 with plasma-etch processing for MEBES 4500S

Thomas P. Coleman, David W. Alexander, Maiying Lu

Proceedings Volume 3236, 17th Annual BACUS Symposium on Photomask Technology and Management; (1997) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.301211
Event: 17th Annual BACUS Photomask Technology and Management, 1997, Redwood City, CA, United States

Abstract

Advanced photomask fabrication specifications for 180 nm generation devices require large-scale improvements to resolution, critical dimension (CD) control, and CD linearity. These requirements mandate the adoption of zero bias processes. The approximately 200 nm of bias required with widely used wet-etch processes cannot meet these advanced specifications. Plasma-etch processing provides an alternative to wet etching and has been shown to have little or no undercutting. However, some of the standard resists used with electron-beam (e-beam) exposure of photomasks have very poor dry-etch characteristics. In this paper, EBR-900 M1 and ZEP 7000 resist processes, in conjunction with inductively coupled plasma (ICP) etching, are described. EBR-900 is a DNQ-novolac i-line resist. The exposure dose and the development process were investigated using a caustic-based developer optimized for e-beam exposure. ZEP 7000 is a polymer of methylstyrene and chloromethyl acrylate, which uses a solvent-based developer. Spray and puddle processes were both investigated for their influence on resist sensitivity, edge slope, resist loss, and CD uniformity. While EBR-900 and ZEP 7000 are less sensitive than PBS, the higher current delivery of newer e- beam systems combined with multipass gray (MPG) writing strategies result in improvements to the lithographic performance without incurring any throughput limitations. MEBES 4500S is the target platform for these processes. It has the gun brightness and writing strategy (MPG) needed to expose these resists while maintaining high throughput.

Citation Download Citation

Thomas P. Coleman, David W. Alexander, and Maiying Lu "Comparison of EBR-900 M1 and ZEP 7000 with plasma-etch processing for MEBES 4500S", Proc. SPIE 3236, 17th Annual BACUS Symposium on Photomask Technology and Management, (12 February 1997); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.301211

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available