Paper
7 May 1997 Performance metric for evaluating conformance of medical image displays with the proposed ACR/NEMA display function standard
Bradley M. Hemminger, Keith E. Muller
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
ACR/NEMA has released for public comment the display function standard document. This standard, produced by ACR/NEMA Working Group XI, has been developed in order to solve the problem of standardizing the response of grey scale display systems. This paper presents a methodology proposed in the display function standard for quantitatively calculating the conformance of a display device to the standard display function based on statistical measures, which are referred to as the linearization uniformity measures (LUM). There are two LUM measures, R2, or global uniformity, and root mean square error, or local uniformity. The derivation of both measures is described. Two additional measures that provide a better description of the achievable dynamic range of a display device than simply its luminance range are also described, the theoretical number of just noticeable differences (JNDS) of the display, and the realized number of JNDS of the display. Currently available medical image display systems are analyzed using each of these measures, to examine their shortcomings, and suggest what changes might be desirable in the design of medical image display systems in the future.
© (1997) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Bradley M. Hemminger and Keith E. Muller "Performance metric for evaluating conformance of medical image displays with the proposed ACR/NEMA display function standard", Proc. SPIE 3031, Medical Imaging 1997: Image Display, (7 May 1997); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.273902
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 2 scholarly publications.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Displays

Image quality standards

Video

Medical imaging

CRTs

Error analysis

Quality measurement

Back to Top