Paper
26 May 1995 Relative merits of using maximum error versus 3(sigma) in describing the performance of laser-exposure reticle writing systems
Henry Chris Hamaker
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
Various techniques for estimating the performance of laser reticle writing systems are examined and compared. The criterion used to measure performance is based on finding the effective maximum error Em, which is defined as the value for which 99.73% of the error population falls within the limits +/- Em. The commonly used technique of using 3(sigma) , where (sigma) is the standard deviation, is shown to be a poor estimate when statistical analyses based on the normal distribution do not describe the data well. Improved accuracy is obtained when corrections based on the skewness (gamma) 1 and the coefficient of excess flatness (gamma) 2 are included. For system qualification, direct observation of the maximum error among a set of approximately 256 samples of the error is the preferred technique. When the sample size differs significantly from this value, the use of corrections based on (gamma) 1 and (gamma) 2 to determine the maximum error is preferred over alternative methods due to its emphasis on the behavior in the tails of the distribution.
© (1995) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Henry Chris Hamaker "Relative merits of using maximum error versus 3(sigma) in describing the performance of laser-exposure reticle writing systems", Proc. SPIE 2440, Optical/Laser Microlithography VIII, (26 May 1995); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.209285
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 4 scholarly publications.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Error analysis

Statistical analysis

Reticles

Composites

Laser systems engineering

Process control

Convolution

RELATED CONTENT

Photomask film degradation effects in the wafer fab how...
Proceedings of SPIE (November 08 2012)
Measurement error revisited
Proceedings of SPIE (December 30 1999)

Back to Top