Comparative evaluation of optical turbulence and extinction instruments to high-energy laser atmospheric propagation

Evan M. Bates; Adrian Azarian; Melissa Beason; Robert Bernath; Kevin Burrett; William L. Filkoski; Steven Fiorino; David Hubble; Brett Jeske; Jürgen Kästel; April Lamoureux; Jordan McCammon; Conor Pogue; Dominik Pudo; Yogendra Raut; Matthew Salfer-Hobbs

doi:10.1117/12.3027168

4 October 2024 Comparative evaluation of optical turbulence and extinction instruments to high-energy laser atmospheric propagation

Evan M. Bates, Adrian Azarian, Melissa Beason, Robert Bernath, Kevin Burrett, William L. Filkoski, Steven Fiorino, David Hubble, Brett Jeske, Jürgen Kästel, April Lamoureux, Jordan McCammon, Conor Pogue, Dominik Pudo, Yogendra Raut, Matthew Salfer-Hobbs

Author Affiliations +

Proceedings Volume 13149, Unconventional Imaging, Sensing, and Adaptive Optics 2024; 131490W (2024) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3027168
Event: Optical Engineering + Applications, 2024, San Diego, California, United States

Abstract

There are many challenges in characterizing open-air laser propagation. Varying measurement methodologies with diverse instrumentation can provide contradictory results for both optical turbulence and extinction. This paper assesses instrumentation accuracy w.r.t. a propagating laser and explores the optimal experimental setup. Accordingly, an open-air experiment was conducted to characterize the atmosphere and high-energy laser (HEL) propagation with commonly deployed instrumentation. Presented here is a comparative evaluation of the instrumentation results to far-field HEL measurements. The differential image motion monitor (DIMM) and the wide angle tele-radiometric transmissometer (WATT) provided measurements with the lowest mean percent error for optical turbulence and extinction, respectively. This suggests that path-integrated dual-sided instrumentation outperforms nodal measurements. However, it is found that nodal measurements perform best near and at the laser’s aperture height if dual-sided instrumentation is not available. Additionally, a quality-control routine is outlined for all deployed instruments considered in the evaluation. The experimental results in this paper yield instrumentation performance for characterizing static laser propagation over land. Further research is recommended to assess instrumentation over longer optical paths both static and dynamic.

Conference Presentation

(2024) Published by SPIE. Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.

Citation Download Citation

Evan M. Bates, Adrian Azarian, Melissa Beason, Robert Bernath, Kevin Burrett, William L. Filkoski, Steven Fiorino, David Hubble, Brett Jeske, Jürgen Kästel, April Lamoureux, Jordan McCammon, Conor Pogue, Dominik Pudo, Yogendra Raut, and Matthew Salfer-Hobbs "Comparative evaluation of optical turbulence and extinction instruments to high-energy laser atmospheric propagation", Proc. SPIE 13149, Unconventional Imaging, Sensing, and Adaptive Optics 2024, 131490W (4 October 2024); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3027168

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available