|
1.INTRODUCTIONThe harmonic oscillator is an important and typical physical model in quantum mechanics and quantum optics. It is very important and widely used, and has been confirmed by the development and application of science and technology. In particular, we can further analyze and discuss the problems related to the hydrogen atom through the relationship between the spatial harmonic oscillator and the hydrogen atom. In recent years, using the double wave function method, asymptotic iteration method, the Fourier transform method, and so on, some researchers study the problem of the one-dimensional or isotropous quantum harmonic oscillator, in which significant results have been obtained [1-14]. In this paper, by the method of separating variables, the steady-state Schrodinger equation of a potential well of an infinite elliptic parabola is solved, and quantum properties of the harmonic oscillator in the potential well of an infinite elliptic parabola are analyzed and studied. The layout of this paper is as follows. In Section 2, using the method of separating variables, we derive solutions for a harmonic oscillator in a potential well of the infinite elliptic paraboloid. In Section 3, we discuss the wave function and the energy spectrum of the harmonic oscillator, revealing its interesting physical properties. Section 4 is summary and conclusion. 2.SOLUTIONS FOR THE SCHRÖDINGER EQUATION OF A HARMONIC OSCILLATOR IN A POTENTIAL WELL OF THE INFINITE ELLIPTIC PARABOLOIDThere is an infinite deep potential well of an ellipse paraboloid, as depicted in Figure 1, the potential function versus the coordinates read as where , and are potential energy constants of the harmonic oscillator in different directions, when u(x, y)= u1, on the plane of u(x, y) = u1, we get the corresponding elliptic equation of the potential function On the xou plane of y = 0, we get the corresponding parabola equation of the potential function On the plane y = tgθ x, we get the corresponding parabola equation of the potential function The Stationary Schrödinger equation for the elliptic paraboloid potential is given by Considering ψ(x, y) = f (x)φ(y), and plugging it into equation (5), we have By separating variables, from equation (6), we get and with E = E1 + E2. Defining and , and solving equation (7), we obtain the stationary wavefunction of equation (7) where , and Hn(ξ1) is a Hermitian polynomial. Similarly, solving equation (8), we obtain the corresponding stationary wavefunction where , and Hm(ξ2) is a Hermitian polynomial. Then the stationary wavefunction for the elliptic paraboloid potential is given by and the total energy of the system is given by 3.ENERGY SPECTRUM AND PROBABILITY DENSITY DISTRIBUTION OF THE HARMONIC OSCILLATOR IN AN ELLIPTIC PARABOLOID POTENTIALFrom equation (14), we see that comparison with the one-dimensional linear harmonic oscillator, energy spectrums of the harmonic oscillator of an elliptic paraboloid are richer. The energy spectrum of the system has two quantum numbers n and m. When n = 0, and m = 0, we get the ground state energy of the harmonic oscillator of an elliptic paraboloid Through the odd and even properties of Hermitic polynomials, the parity of the harmonic oscillator of an elliptic paraboloid it can be discussed. From equation (13), we have When n+m is even, wavefunction exhibits even parity; n+m is odd, it has odd parity. The probability density function of the harmonic oscillator of an elliptic paraboloid is given by Utilizing equation (17), one can present the distribution diagrams of the probability density of the harmonic oscillator of an elliptic paraboloid. Figure 2 presents probability density distributions of the harmonic oscillator in an elliptic paraboloid potential for different quantum numbers n and m, and exhibits effects of the quantum numbers on probability density distributions. In Figure 2a, the quantum numbers are n = 0, and m = 0, the harmonic oscillator is in the ground state, the energy of the ground state E0 0 = ℏ[ω1+ω2)]/2, and the probability density exhibits one maximum at the potential well center, where the probability of the oscillator appearance is the greatest. In Figure 2b, the quantum numbers are n = 2, and m = 1, its energy is E2,1 = ℏ[5ω1 + 3ω2)]/2, and the probability density exhibits six extremums, at the locations of which the probabilities of the oscillator appearance are relatively large. In Figure 2c, the quantum numbers are n = 2, and m = 4, its energy is E2,1 = ℏ[5ω1 + 9ω2)]/2, and the probability density exhibits fifteen extreme values at the locations of which the harmonic oscillator is most likely to occur. From Figure 2, we see that numbers of extreme values of the probability density distribution satisfy (n+1)(m+1). In Figure 3a, the quantum number n is fixed to be n = 3, the quantum number m is from 1, 3, to 5. From 1 to 3, the peak value of the probability density decreases; however, from 3 to 5, the peak value increases to the maximum. In Figure 3b, the quantum number m is fixed to be m = 2, the quantum number m changes from 1, 3, to 5. The peak value of the probability density changes similarly. The quantum numbers n and m have regulatory effects on the peak value and the distribution of the probability density of the harmonic oscillator in the elliptic paraboloid potential. In order to further analyze the influence of the quantum number on probability density distribution, we exhibit effects of the quantum numbers n and m on the maximum value of the probability density in Figure 4. When one quantum number is fixed and another quantum number increases, the general trend is that the maximum number of the probability density increases and the maximum value of probability density decreases. However, this reduction is with oscillations and fluctuations, which shows even a maximum structure for the smaller quantum numbers. Under the same system parameters, the probability density distribution on different cutting surfaces is various. The plane θ = π/4 compared with the plane θ = π/3, as Figure 5 shown, the distribution of the probability density value is relatively strong on the plane θ = π/4, especially, the maximum value of the edge peak being more prominent. Figure 6 shows the effects of the elliptic oblateness on the distribution of the probability density of the harmonic oscillator in the elliptic paraboloid potential. The flatter the ellipse is, the greater the probability density of the ellipse center, and the smaller the extreme of the edge peak of the probability density will be. 4.SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONFrom the above discussion, we derive the following main results. The energy of the harmonic oscillator in the elliptic paraboloid potential is quantized, which is described by two quantum numbers n, and m. The distribution of the probability density of the harmonic oscillator shows the extremum structure. The numbers of extreme values of the probability density distribution corresponding to En m = ℏ[ω1(n+1/2) + ω2(m+1/2)] are (n + 1)(m +1). The quantum numbers n and m play a vital role in the maximum peak value of the probability density. Generally speaking, the maximum peak value of the probability density decreases as the extremum number of the probability density increases. However, this reduction is with oscillations and fluctuations, which shows even a maximum structure for the smaller quantum numbers. For the elliptic paraboloid potential, the spatial distribution of the probability density on different cutting surfaces is various. The flatter the ellipse is, the greater the probability density of the ellipse center, and the smaller the extreme of the edge peak of the probability density will be. ACKNOWLEDGMENTThis grant was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Puer University under Contract No. 201509. REFERENCESRampho, G. J., Ikot, A. N., Edet, C. O. and Okorie, U. S.,
“Energy spectra and thermal properties of diatomic molecules in the presence of magnetic and AB fields with improved Kratzer potential,”
Molecular Physics, 119
(5), 1
–17
(2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/00268976.2020.1821922 Google Scholar
Ishkhanyan, A. M.,
“A conditionally exactly solvable generalization of the inverse square root potential,”
Physics Letters A, 380
(45), 3786
–3790
(2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2016.09.035 Google Scholar
Ikot, A. N., Rampho, G. J., Amad, P. O., Okorie, U. S., Sithole, M. J. and Lekala, M. L.,
“Quantum information-entropic measures for exponential-type potential,”
Results in Physics, 18
(2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103150 Google Scholar
Grosche, C.,
“Conditionally solvable path integral problems,”
J. Phys. A: Math. Gen, 28
(1995). https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/28/20/018 Google Scholar
C. O. Edet, Okoi, P. O. and Chima, S. O.,
“Analytic solutions of the Schrödinger equation with non-central generalized inverse quadratic Yukawa potential,”
Rev. Bras. Ensino Fís, 42
(2020). https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9126-rbef-2019-0083 Google Scholar
Miraboutalebi, S.,
“Solutions of Klein-Gordon equation with Mie-type potential via the Laplace transforms,”
Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 135
(16), 1
–12
(2020). Google Scholar
Roshanzamir, M.,
“The information-theoretic treatment of spinless particles with the assorted diatomic molecular potential,”
Advances in High Energy Physics,
(12),
(2022). Google Scholar
Khan, Y.,
“An effective modification of the Laplace decomposition method for nonlinear equations,”
International Journal of Nonlinear Sciences and Numerical Simulation, 10
(11-12), 1373
–1376
(2009). https://doi.org/10.1515/IJNSNS.2009.10.11-12.1373 Google Scholar
Jiang, Y., Dong S. H. and Sun, G.-H.,
“Series solutions of the Schrödinger equation with position-dependent mass for the Morse potential,”
Physics Letters A, 322
(5-6), 290
–297
(2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2004.01.039 Google Scholar
Hall, R. L. and Saad, N.,
“Eigenvalue bounds for transformations of solvable potentials,”
J. Phys. A: Math. Gen, 29 2127
(1996). https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/29/9/024 Google Scholar
Chen, G.,
“The exact solutions of the Schrödinger equation with the Morse potential via Laplace transforms,”
Physics Letters A, 326
(1-2), 55
–57
(2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2004.04.029 Google Scholar
Ikot, A. N., Okorie, U. and Ngiangia, A. T., et. al,
“Bound state solutions of the Schrödinger equation with energy dependent molecular Kratzer potential via asymptotic iteration method,”
Eclética Química, 45
(1), 65
–77
(2020). Google Scholar
Cooper, F., Khare, A. and Sukhatme, U.,
“Supersymmetry and quantum mechanics,”
Phys. Rep, 251
(5-6), 267
–385
(1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(94)00080-M Google Scholar
Edet, C. O., Okorie, U. S., Ngiangia, A. T. and Ikot, A. N.,
“Bound state solutions of the Schrodinger equation for the modified Kratzer potential plus screened Coulomb potential,”
Indian Journal of Physics, 94 425
–433
(2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12648-019-01477-9 Google Scholar
|