|
How can we design a physics course to celebrate diversity in physics and promote inclusivity in the field? The topics in a typical introductory physics course were discovered more than 150 years ago, but women and minorities were not able to fully participate in physics until the end of the 19th century, concentrating in the burgeoning fields of astrophysics, optics, and nuclear physics [1, 2]. In this paper, I describe a new physics course dedicated to studying the pioneering physics research done by women, African Americans, and members of other groups underrepresented in physics. In addition to reading about these physicists’ lives and discoveries, students also learn about the hidden and overt obstacles that can hinder their persistence in the field, including bias, imposter syndrome, and stereotype threat. The goal of the course is to highlight the diverse scientists who have been major players in physics for over a century but who do not get covered in a standard introductory curriculum [3]. This is also an opportunity to teach modern physics and state-of-the-art research to non-majors and majors alike. The goal of this paper is to share ideas and resources to promote the development of similar courses. There are wonderful resources available, but it can be challenging to assemble them into a coherent story. For example, excellent biographies of women physicists can be found in McGrayne’s Nobel Prize Women in Science [4], Calvin’s Beyond Curie [5], Byers’s Out of the Shadows [6], Rayner-Canham’s A Devotion to their Science [2], and the American Institute of Physics (AIP) Teaching Guides on Women and Minorities [7]. In addition, resources on the demographics of physics and the challenges faced by groups underrepresented in physics are detailed in the American Physical Society (APS) LGBT Climate report [8], the AIP TEAM-UP report [9], and the AAUW Why So Few? report [10], as well as recent commentary in Physics Today [11–13] and Optics and Photonics News [14,15]. The course uses three physics themes to tie everything together: nuclear physics, optics, and astronomy (along with astrophysics and space exploration). The course schedule is listed in Table 1. In addition to the resources listed above, the major readings for the course are Des Jardins’s The Madame Curie Complex [16], Conkling’s Radioactive! [17], Howes’s Their Day in the Sun [18], Kiernan’s The Girls of Atomic City [19], Mickens’s Edward Bouchet [20], Pollack’s The Only Woman in the Room [21], Sobel’s The Glass Universe [22], Al-Khalili’s The House of Wisdom [23], and Shetterly’s Hidden Figures [24]. Many other physicists and resources used in the course do not fit within the page limit of this paper but will be presented at the conference. Table 1.Physics topics, people, and inclusivity activities covered in the course, with each row in the people and activities columns corresponding to one 2-hour class meeting.
This course is taught during Middlebury College’s 4-week winter term, in which students take a single course which meets for 2 hours for 4 days per week. The class meeting begins with a brief lecture on the physics, a recap of the physicist’s biographies, and an open discussion of the readings. After a short recess, students break out into small groups to discuss the challenges faced by physicists from underrepresented groups. Outside of class, in addition to readings, there is a major paper due at the end of each week: writing a physics autobiography [25], exploring obstacles faced by underrepresented physicists, and writing a biography of a physicist which includes an explanation of the scientific discovery. For the final project, students give a poster presentation highlighting physicists that are not already covered in the course, and the posters are publicly displayed as a long-term exhibit along our physics department corridor. ReferencesR. L. Sime,
“Women in science: Struggle & success, the tale of Mileva Einstein-Marić, Einstein’s wife,”
MIT Press. Blog(2019). Google Scholar
M. F. Rayner-Canham and G. Rayner-Canham, Devotion to Their Science: Pioneer Women of Radioactivity, Chemical Heritage Foundation, Philadephia, PA
(1997). Google Scholar
E. Yong,
“The women who contributed to science but were buried in footnotes,”
The Atl,
(2019). Google Scholar
S. B. McGrayne, Nobel Prize Women in Science: Their lives, struggles, and momentous discoveries, 2Joseph Henry Press, Washington, DC
(2001). Google Scholar
S. Calvin, Beyond Curie: Four Women in Physics and Their Remarkable Discoveries, 1903 to 1963, Morgan & Claypool Publishers, San Rafael, CA
(2017). Google Scholar
N. Byers and G. Williams, Out of the Shadows: Contributions of Twentieth-Century Women to Physics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
(2006). Google Scholar
, “Center for History of Physics at AIP, Teaching guides on women and minorities,”
(2021) https://www.aip.org/history-programs/physics-history/teaching-guides Google Scholar
T. J. Atherton, R. S. Barthelemy, W. Deconinck, M. L. Falk, S. Garmon, E. Long, M. Plisch, E. H. Simmons, and K. Reeves, LGBT climate in physics: Building an inclusive community, American Physical Society, College Park, MD
(2016). Google Scholar
The AIP National Task Force to Elevate African American Representation in Undergraduate Physics & Astronomy (TEAM-UP), The Time is Now: Systemic Changes to Increase African Americans with Bachelor’s Degrees in Physics and Astronomy, American Institute of Physics, College Park, MD
(2020). Google Scholar
C. Hill, C. Corbett, and A. St. Rose, Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics, American Association of University Women, Washington, DC
(2010). Google Scholar
B. Cheeseboro,
“Finding a way to belong: Impostor syndrome and mental health,”
Phys. Today,
(2020). Google Scholar
C. D. Brown, II,
“Commentary: Disentangling anti-blackness from physics,”
Phys. Today,
(2020). Google Scholar
K. R. Horton,
“The disability is there, but I belong,”
Phys. Today,
(2020). Google Scholar
A. M. Johnson,
“Combatting stereotype threat,”
Opt. Photonics News, 16
–18
(2013). Google Scholar
S. Wills,
“In search of equity,”
Opt. Photonics News, 31 24
–33
(2020). Google Scholar
J. Des Jardins, The Madame Curie Complex: The Hidden History of Women in Science, The Feminist Press at CUNY,2010). Google Scholar
W. Conkling, Radioactive!: How Irène Curie and Lise Meitner Revolutionized Science and Changed the World, Algonquin Books,2016). Google Scholar
R. H. Howes and C. L. Herzenberg, Their Day in the Sun: Women of the Manhattan Project, Temple University Press,2003). Google Scholar
D. Kiernan, The Girls of Atomic City: the Untold Story of the Women who Helped Win World War II, Simon and Schuster,2014). Google Scholar
R. E. Mickens, Edward Bouchet: The First African-American Doctorate, World Scientific Publishing,2002). Google Scholar
E. Pollack, The Only Woman in the Room: Why Science is Still a Boys’ Club, Beacon Press, Boston,MA
(2015). Google Scholar
D. Sobel, The Glass Universe: How the Ladies of the Harvard Observatory Took the Measure of the Stars, Penguin Books,2016). Google Scholar
J. Al-Khalili, The house of wisdom: how Arabic science saved ancient knowledge and gave us the Renaissance, Penguin Books,2012). Google Scholar
M. L. Shetterly, Hidden Figures: The American Dream and the Untold Story of the Black Women Mathematicians Who Helped Win the Space Race, Harper Collins,2016). Google Scholar
B. Braun,
“Personal, expository, critical, and creative: Using writing in mathematics courses,”
Primus, 24 447
–464
(2014). Google Scholar
|