|
|
1.INTRODUCTIONMeteosat Third Generation (MTG) is the next challenging mission for accurate observation of the Earth dedicated to meteorology Nowcasting and Forecasting. MTG encompasses two different missions: MTG-I (Imaging)[1][2] and MTG-S (Sounding). MTG-I optical payload counts a Flexible Combined Imager (FCI) and a Lightning Imager (LI). The FCI is a multi-spectral imager in the continuity of Meteosat Second Generation (MSG) with improved performance and additional spectral bands. The FCI is developed, integrated and tested by Thales Alenia Space in France, whereas the LI is developed by Leonardo (Italy). MTG-S carries the IRS instrument which is an Infrared Fourier Transform Spectrometer dedicated to the sounding of the atmosphere inspired by the previous IASI mission[3][4]. The IRS instrument is being developed, integrated and tested by OHB. encompasses two major sub-assemblies provided by Thales Alenia Space in France: the Interferometer Assembly and the Detection Electronic Assembly. MTG satellites are located on a geostationary orbit. MTG-I satellite images the full hemisphere with FCI in less than 10 minutes in 16 different spectral bands from Visible to Very Long Wave IR at a resolution of 0.5-2 km, while MTG-S satellite makes a complete IR sounding of the atmosphere (IRS) in less than 1h at a spatial resolution of 4 km and a spectral sampling of 0.625 cm-1. In this article, we focus on the detection chains of FCI and IRS instruments which provide accurate sight to the remote sensing capabilities and thus aiming at achieving the objectives of MTG-I and MTG-S missions[5][6] for meteorological applications. This represents a total of 5 detection chains for FCI and 2 detection chains for IRS, all being under Thales Alenia Space responsibility for MTG. The paper presents at the same time the different particularities, design hardware and performance of FCI and IRS detection chains, as it is an interesting way to compare the two instruments and the two missions, even though the need and the concepts are specific to each instrument. The spectral bands of interest of each mission, and how it is dispatch into multiple detection chains, are presented in a first paragraph. Then, the specific design and hardware of each focal plane array is described, in particular the pixels design and the different detectors disposition in the field of view of the instrument. Then the global video chains architectures are introduced to present how the photo-electronic information is processed from the analog acquisition to the digitalization. After these descriptions, paragraph four will indicate some significant remote functionalities implemented in the video chains (at detector or electronic processing level), as well as some interesting parameters that can be adjusted by telecommand in flight in complement to the ones frozen on ground. Some recent MTG PFM on ground tests, achieved in Thales Alenia Space premises, have provided interesting results which are therefore presented in the last paragraph. These results have been obtained after 10 years of intensive research and development at Thales Alenia Space (Prime FCI) & OHB (Prime IRS), with the support and supervision of ESA and EUMETSAT. 2.SPECTRAL BANDS OF INTEREST OF FCI AND IRSThe MTG mission is a wide band mission allowing addressing various aspects of the meteorology on Earth. For imaging, the FCI instrument counts 16 narrow spectral bands from 0.4μm to 13.3μm. All 16 bands are acquired simultaneously. For sounding, the IRS instrument counts 2 wide spectral bands in the IR region. Those spectral bands are indicated in Table 1. We have designed a retina (= photovoltaic material with its readout circuit) for each band of interest. On FCI, retinas presenting close spectral bands have been integrated in a same packaging to constitute a Detector Assembly (DA = retina + optical filter + mechanical support + electrical connector). The DA packaging is then constituted of the retina, the optical bandpass filter, the mechanical support and the electrical connector with flexible cable between the connector and the retina. On FCI, five DA are necessary to cover the need. On IRS, it is more classical as the two large spectral bands imposed to have two DAs with only one retina per DA. One DA dedicated for MWIR range and one DA dedicated for LWIR range. Hence, two DA are necessary on IRS. 3.FOCAL PLAN ARRAY OF FCI AND IRS DETECTORS3.1Retina designsFigure 1 and Figure 2 present respectively a schematic of the pixel and retina design for FCI and IRS. The objective for FCI is to have a Linear sampling of 1 column by 112, 224 or 448 pixels (depending on the spectral channel and its specific SSD) as we will have along track continuous scanning of Earth surface. The implementation of different columns offers the possibility to select the best pixel per row and to guaranty a 100 % pixel operability in the field of view. On IRS (Figure 4), the two ranges MWIR and LWIR present the same pixel design on geometrical optical point of view. Their pitch is of 90 μm which draws a SSD of 4 km on ground at the Earth equator. The field of view is a square of 160x160 pixels. Each pixels is actually the 3x3 electrical binning of smaller subpixels. In reality, the matrix is a 480x480 subpixels of 30 μm pitch. This architecture, by the way of a best subpixels selection mapping, permits to get a nearly 100 % of operability in binning mode even with a challenging cut off LWIR matrix of 14.5 μm. At such cut-off, the photosensitive material presents inevitably localized defects at the subpixel scale which can be erased by the combination of mapping deselection and electrical binning association. The retina picture can be either of 160² or 480² pixels according to the serial data word sent by telecommand to the detector. The constrains of interferograms imposed to get a 160² pixel picture at the frame cadency of approximately 2500 Hz. With a pixel frequency of 4 Mhz, the frame frequency is possible if the retina is read with 16 parallel video chains (each one of 160x10=1600 pixels). The retina read out circuit is versatile that is to say it has been designed so as to be compatible for MWIR as well as LWIR photosensitive material. The corresponding pixel capacitance size can be selected according to the photosensitive material hybridized above them. The Read Out Circuits are classical with a reception stage of biases and master clock, and, by the way of multiplexing stages and video amplifiers, they deliver an analog video Dynamic Range signal of 2-3V towards the remote video electronic boards (VCU). During the acquisition of successive interferogram frames before Fourier transform spectral reconstruction, the line of sight of the pointed field of view is maintained static. At the end of each interferogram, the line of sight is shifted by a step of approximately 158 pixels (the difference of 2 pixels wrt the 160 pixels of a complete field of view assures an overlay of 2 pixels between neighbor fields of view). Again, interferograms are acquired in this static field of view position. The operation is repeated step by step to cover at the end the entire Earth hemisphere seen at geostationary orbit. Commonly, the FCI and IRS detectors are based on a snapshot picture acquisition combined with an Integrated While Read protocol based on CMOS pixel addressing and read out. Integration times can be programmed until the maximum frame period duration which is fixed and common for all detectors of an instrument. The photodetectors are in Silicon for visible range and in HgCdTe for NIR and IR domain. A final common constrain for FCI and IRS is to guaranty a perfect superposition of the field of view between the different spectral field of view seen by each detector in order to make an accurate spatial superposition of the spectral information. Then each detector can be adjusted in focus but also in lateral position in the focal plan array to superpose the pictures. This operation is made and controlled during the on ground integrations and tests. 3.2Dispositions of detectors in the focal plansThe common entrance beam is split into five different spectral beams for FCI and two beams for IRS by the way of dichroic beam splitters. On FCI, the most critical disposition is for the four IR detectors which are necessitating to be cooled at cryogenic temperature of 60K. The detectors are fixed on a cooled table and put side by side together to form a square as depicted by Figure 3 On IRS, the situation is the same but with only two detectors. The detectors are put in front each side of a dichroic beam splitter and they are fixed on a cryogenic “cold box” inserted in a cryostat (Figure 4). The working temperature is of 55 K. Cryogenic temperature is necessary to limit the shot noise of the dark current and to guaranty the SNR objective of all IR spectral channels. 4.THE DETECTION CHAINS : DESIGNS AND HARDWARES4.1The Detector AssembliesThe five FCI Detector Assemblies (Figure 5 & Figure 6) are constituted of a retina (formed of the photosensitive material and the Read Out Integrated Circuit), a filter and a protective window above the retina, a flexible cable makes the electrical link between on one side the retina and the video electronics by a connector brazed at the other side. A black shield is surrounding the retina to limit the optical straylight. All is fixed on a base plate, at instrument temperature for visible detector, at 60K for IR detectors. The two IRS Detector Assemblies (Figure 7) are composed of a retina, of a flexible cable that makes the electrical link between the retina and the video electronics by a connector brazed at one side. A black shield is surrounding the retina to limit the optical straylight. All is fixed on a 55 K base plate. Contrary to FCI, no windows nor filter are present. The optical band pass selection is made by an association of instrument cut-on optics and photosensitive retina material cutoff wavelength. 4.2The video Chain electronicsThe Video Chain Electronics (VCU) are on both instrument FCI and IRS constituted of the same elements with the same principle of architecture. Hence, we describe the IRS detection chain architecture as it is supposed to be the most representative one because of the number of pixels, the high counts of digitalized video signals and its remote functions (for the detectors and for the interferometer). The VCU is acquiring the video information from the detectors, adapting it to the ADC stage (VAE) and transmitting it to the remote Data Processing Unit (DPU) through a single high speed serial link. Also, the VCU is managing the DA functionalities and making a synchronization with the interferometer metrology data. As shown in Figure 8, the VCU-S is composed of the following elements:
The architecture has been designed with objective of the optimum reliability, maximum video performance (lowest noise) and to offer easy and fine adjustments of the analog DA signal to benefit of the maximum available conversion swing. Power supply distribution of FEE and DA has been defined at VCU level to reach the very low noise requirements at FEE/DA interface. During PFM campaigns, the VCU noise contribution has been measured lower than 1.6 LSB16 on a dynamic of 65536 (216) levels (Figure 9) 5.SETTING AND REMOTE FUNCTIONS OF THE DETECTION CHAINSBy the way of the Video Chain Unit and DA design, few functions are available to select different modes of DA acquisitions but also to optimize some settings and to benefit of smart remote processing. These affordable functions on the detection chains are summarized hereafter:
6.PERFORMANCESignificant performance are indicated for FCI on Table 2 and for IRS on Table 3. The IRS uniformity of pixel induces on both spectral ranges a low PRNU and a high SNR (typical above 3100 in MWIR and 7700 in LWIR) with a Gaussian distribution for an input uniform scene illumination at 270 K. The map of the SNR and the associated histograms are presented on Figure 10. These figures have been obtained without any equalisation nor non uniformity corrections : they are video data results immediately grabbed at the output of the ADC without any special processing. The pictures highlight the field SNR performance uniformities of the entire pixel population that constitutes a key performance for a spectro-imager like IRS. The SNR performance combined with spectral response of the instrument, after spectral interferograms reconstruction is expected to provide a spectral NEDT. This spectral NEDT indicated on Figure 11 gives the ultimate performance the IRS instrument can reach on each spectral channel. 7.CONCLUSIONFCI and IRS PFM detection chain fully designed and integrated by Thales Alenia Space have been characterized on PFM. Major performance of spectral SNR, NEDT, linearity and pixel operability are in line with expectations and objectives. Sub equipment (Detectors, Video Chain Electronics) have been successfully tested to environments (in particular for vibrations, shock, life test and irradiations) IRS PFM will be delivered by Thales Alenia Space to OHB Munich beginning of this year for a complete and final IRS instrument integration, to check full functionalities and performance characterization of the complete device. MTG FCI & IRS FM2 are today in progress of integration in Cannes premises. Thales Alenia Space is fully grateful to OHB for close partnership on MTG, to ESA for technical and management supervision, to ESA and EUMETSAT for supports and confidence in Meteosat program and to all the subcontractors who have designed and provided the best sub-equipment for the tomorrow meteorological forecasts. Concerning the detection chain subequipment, we specially acknowledge LYNRED, E2V TELEDYNE, Thales Alenia Space in Spain. REFERENCESMartin, P & Al,
“FCI instrument on-board MeteoSat Third Generation Satellite - design and development status,”
ICSO 2020,
(2021). Google Scholar
Ouaknine, J. Gaudin-Delrieu, C. Liotard, A, Boni, A., Aminou, D. Durand, Y.,
“FCI PFM optical test results,”
ICSO 2020,
(2021). Google Scholar
Siméoni, D & Al,
“Design and development of IASI instrument,”
in Proc. SPIE. 5543, Infrared Spaceborne Remote Sensing XII,
(2004). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.561090 Google Scholar
Blumstein, D & Al,
“IASI instrument: technical overview and measured performances,”
in Proc. SPIE. 5543, Infrared Spaceborne Remote Sensing XII,
(2004). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.560907 Google Scholar
, “European Space Agency, Meteosat Third Generation (MTG) Space Craft System Requirements Document (SC_SRD) [AD03],”
ref. MTG.ESA.SA.RS.0062,
(3.3),
(2013) Google Scholar
, “European Space Agency, Meteosat Third Generation (MTG) Terms, Definitions, Conventions and Abbreviations [AD16],”
ref. MTG.ESA.SA.RS.0052,
(4.1),
(2013) Google Scholar
|