Presentation + Paper
10 May 2019 Radar emitter and activity identification using deep clustering methods
Diego Marez, Samuel Borden, Gregori Clarke, John Reeder, Nicholas Johnson
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
Current challenges in spectrum monitoring include radar emitter state identification and the ability to detect changes in radar activity. Recently, large labeled datasets and better compute power have led to improvements in the classification performance of deep neural network (DNN) models on structured data like time series and images. The reliance on large labeled dataset in order to achieve state of the art performance is a hindrance for machine learning applications especially in the area of radar, which tends to have a wealth of noisy and unlabeled data. Due to the abundance of unlabeled data, the problem of radar emitter and activity identification is commonly setup as a clustering problem, which requires no labels. The deep clustering approach uses an underlying deep feature extractor such as an autoencoder to learn a low dimensional feature representation in the service of facilitating a clustering task. In this paper, we will evaluate different clustering loss functions such as K-means for training DNNs, and we use radar emitter state and activity identification as our example task.
Conference Presentation
© (2019) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Diego Marez, Samuel Borden, Gregori Clarke, John Reeder, and Nicholas Johnson "Radar emitter and activity identification using deep clustering methods", Proc. SPIE 11006, Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Multi-Domain Operations Applications, 110061H (10 May 2019); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2517864
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Radar

Data modeling

Systems modeling

Visual process modeling

Computer programming

Feature extraction

Neural networks

Back to Top