Errata

Large-field-of-view optical elastography using digital image correlation for biological soft tissue investigation (erratum)

[+] Author Affiliations
Daniel Claus, Jonathan Geibel, Thomas Reichenbach, Giancarlo Pedrini, Wolfgang Osten

Universität Stuttgart, Institut für Technische Optik, Stuttgart, Germany

Marijo Mlikota, Siegfried Schmauder

Universität Stuttgart, Institut für Materialprüfung, Werkstoffkunde und Festigkeitslehre, Stuttgart, Germany

Johannes Mischinger

Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Klinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany

J. Med. Imag. 4(2), 029801 (Jun 01, 2017). doi:10.1117/1.JMI.4.2.029801
Text Size: A A A

Open Access Open Access

This article [J. Med. Imag. 4(1), 014505 (2017)] was originally published with the captions for Figs. 8 and 9 transposed. The captions and figures below are correctly matched.

Figures in this Article

Graphic Jump Location
Fig. 8
F8 :

Stress distributions obtained using the hyperelastic Arruda–Boyce model for Abaqus (a) σxx at the front surface, (b, c, d) 3-D stress distribution along (b) the x-direction σxx, (c) y-direction σyy, (d) and z-direction σzz with indenter positioned on top of inhomogeneity, (e) 3-D stress distribution along z-direction σzz with indenter positioned in 10 mm distance to inhomogeneity.

Graphic Jump Location
Fig. 9
F9 :

Flow chart and results for obtained displacements fields with and without foreign body, the resulting difference displacement field, the calculate strain field, and corresponding cross-section plot, which compares the difference approach strain field with the conventional results shown in Fig. 7(b).

This article was corrected online on 23 May 2017.

© 2017 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers

Citation

Daniel Claus ; Marijo Mlikota ; Jonathan Geibel ; Thomas Reichenbach ; Giancarlo Pedrini, et al.
"Large-field-of-view optical elastography using digital image correlation for biological soft tissue investigation (erratum)", J. Med. Imag. 4(2), 029801 (Jun 01, 2017). ; http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.4.2.029801


Figures

Graphic Jump Location
Fig. 8
F8 :

Stress distributions obtained using the hyperelastic Arruda–Boyce model for Abaqus (a) σxx at the front surface, (b, c, d) 3-D stress distribution along (b) the x-direction σxx, (c) y-direction σyy, (d) and z-direction σzz with indenter positioned on top of inhomogeneity, (e) 3-D stress distribution along z-direction σzz with indenter positioned in 10 mm distance to inhomogeneity.

Graphic Jump Location
Fig. 9
F9 :

Flow chart and results for obtained displacements fields with and without foreign body, the resulting difference displacement field, the calculate strain field, and corresponding cross-section plot, which compares the difference approach strain field with the conventional results shown in Fig. 7(b).

Tables

References

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Related Book Chapters

Topic Collections

PubMed Articles
Advertisement
  • Don't have an account?
  • Subscribe to the SPIE Digital Library
  • Create a FREE account to sign up for Digital Library content alerts and gain access to institutional subscriptions remotely.
Access This Article
Sign in or Create a personal account to Buy this article ($20 for members, $25 for non-members).
Access This Proceeding
Sign in or Create a personal account to Buy this article ($15 for members, $18 for non-members).
Access This Chapter

Access to SPIE eBooks is limited to subscribing institutions and is not available as part of a personal subscription. Print or electronic versions of individual SPIE books may be purchased via SPIE.org.